Automatic Integrated Scoring Model for English Composition Oriented to Part-Of-Speech Tagging

被引:1
作者
Chen, Fei [1 ]
机构
[1] Chengdu Med Coll, Foreign Language Teaching Dept, Teaching Ctr Gen Courses, Chengdu 610500, Peoples R China
关键词
SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1155/2021/5544257
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Part-of-speech tagging for English composition is the basis for automatic correction of English composition. The performance of the part-of-speech tagging system directly affects the performance of the marking and analysis of the correction system. Therefore, this paper proposes an automatic scoring model for English composition based on article part-of-speech tagging. First, use the convolutional neural network to extract the word information from the character level and use this part of the information in the coarse-grained learning layer. Secondly, the word-level vector is introduced, and the residual network is used to establish an information path to integrate the coarse-grained annotation and word vector information. Then, the model relies on the recurrent neural network to extract the overall information of the sequence data to obtain accurate annotation results. Then, the features of the text content are extracted, and the automatic scoring model of English composition is constructed by means of model fusion. Finally, this paper uses the English composition scoring competition data set on the international data mining competition platform Kaggle to verify the effect of the model.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Parts-of-Speech tagging for Malayalam using deep learning techniques [J].
Akhil K.K. ;
Rajimol R. ;
Anoop V.S. .
International Journal of Information Technology, 2020, 12 (3) :741-748
[2]  
Alharbi S.H., 2017, English Language Teaching, V10, P33
[3]  
Awwalu J., 2020, Fudma Journal of Sciences, V4, P712, DOI [10.33003/fjs-2020-0402-325, DOI 10.33003/FJS-2020-0402-325]
[4]   Design and evaluation of automated writing evaluation models: Relationships with writing in naturalistic settings [J].
Bridgeman, Brent ;
Ramineni, Chaitanya .
ASSESSING WRITING, 2017, 34 :62-71
[5]   Factors affecting variance in Classroom Assessment Scoring System scores: season, context, and classroom composition [J].
Buell, Martha ;
Han, Myae ;
Vukelich, Carol .
EARLY CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND CARE, 2017, 187 (11) :1635-1648
[6]  
Bui V.-T., 2020, INT J INTELLIGENT EN, V13, P156, DOI [10.22266/ijies2020.0229.15, DOI 10.22266/IJIES2020.0229.15]
[7]  
Chen J., 2016, ETS Research Report Series, V2016, P1, DOI DOI 10.1002/ETS2.12094
[8]  
Flor M., 2018, Journal of Writing Analytics, V2, P203, DOI [10.37514/jwa-j.2018.2.1.08, DOI 10.37514/JWA-J.2018.2.1.08]
[9]   Single sample scoring of molecular phenotypes [J].
Foroutan, Momeneh ;
Bhuva, Dharmesh D. ;
Lyu, Ruqian ;
Horan, Kristy ;
Cursons, Joseph ;
Davis, Melissa J. .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2018, 19
[10]   The affordances of AI-enabled automatic scoring applications on learners' continuous learning intention: An empirical study in China [J].
Fu, Shixuan ;
Gu, Huimin ;
Yang, Bo .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 51 (05) :1674-1692