Validation of the VERT wearable jump monitor device in elite youth volleyball players

被引:41
作者
Borges, Thiago O. [1 ]
Moreira, Alexandre [2 ]
Bacchi, Renato [3 ]
Finotti, Ronaldo L. [1 ,4 ]
Ramos, Mayara [1 ]
Lopes, Charles R. [5 ]
Aoki, Marcelo S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Arts Sci & Humanities, Av Arlindo Bettio 1000, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Phys Educ & Sport, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Brazilian Volleyball Confederat CBV, Saquarema, RJ, Brazil
[4] Ind Social Serv Sao Paulo SESI, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[5] Adventist Fac Hortolandia FAH, Dept Phys Educ, Hortolandia, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Vertical jump; Lower limb; Power; Validity; TRAINING LOAD; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.5114/biolsport.2017.66000
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
This technical report aims to determine the validity and the accuracy of the VERT Wearable Jump Monitor. The participants of this study were all experienced volleyball players from the U18 category from the Brazilian National team. To assess jump performance, the VERT scores were compared to the VERTEC (jump and reach device). Each athlete performed 3 attack and 3 block jumps in a random, counterbalanced order, and the average score was registered. In the attack jumps, the VERTEC and VERT mean +/- SD scores were 70.9 +/- 8.2 and 76.3 +/- 7.5 cm, respectively, and the typical error of the estimate (TEE) as a coefficient of variation (CV) was 7.8% (90% CL 7.0 to 8.9%). VERTEC and VERT devices presented a very large Pearson's correlation for attack jumps (r=0.75; 90% CL 0.68 to 0.81). In addition, the mean +/- SD block jumps were 53.7 +/- 6.1 and 58.5 +/- 5.7 cm for the VERTEC and VERT, respectively and the TEE as a CV was 7.9% (90% CL 7.1 to 8.9%). Pearson's correlation coefficient was very large for block jumps (r=0.75; 90% CL 0.67 to 0.81). The VERT device was found to be a very practical tool to quantify jump performance in volleyball players.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 242
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], LECT EDUCACION FISIC
[2]  
[Anonymous], J SCI MED SPORT
[3]  
[Anonymous], NEW VIEW STAT
[4]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]   The Quantification of Training Load, the Training Response and the Effect on Performance [J].
Borresen, Jill ;
Lambert, Michael Ian .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 39 (09) :779-795
[6]   DATA RELIABILITY FROM AN INSTRUMENTED VERTICAL JUMP PLATFORM [J].
Caruso, John F. ;
Daily, Jeremy S. ;
McLagan, Jessica R. ;
Shepherd, Catherine M. ;
Olson, Nathan M. ;
Marshall, Mallory R. ;
Taylor, Skyler T. .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2010, 24 (10) :2799-2808
[7]   Validity, reliability and sensitivity of measures of sporting performance [J].
Currell, Kevin ;
Jeukendrup, Asker E. .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 2008, 38 (04) :297-316
[8]  
Hopkins WG., 2002, SCALE MAGNITUDES EFF, DOI DOI 10.1590/1677-5449.180095
[9]   METABOLIC CHANGES DURING VOLLEYBALL MATCHES [J].
KUNSTLINGER, U ;
LUDWIG, HG ;
STEGEMANN, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1987, 8 (05) :315-322
[10]  
Lambert M.I., 2006, INT J SPORTS SCI COA, V1, P371, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1260/174795406779367684, DOI 10.1260/174795406779367684]