Discussions on Present Japanese Psychocultural-Social Tendencies as Obstacles to Clinical Shared Decision-Making in Japan

被引:18
作者
Asai, Atsushi [1 ]
Okita, Taketoshi [1 ]
Bito, Seiji [2 ]
机构
[1] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Med Eth, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
[2] Natl Hosp Org Tokyo Med Ctr, Div Clin Epidemiol, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Shared decision-making; Japan; Clinical ethics; Autonomy;
D O I
10.1007/s41649-021-00201-2
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
In Japan, where a prominent gap exists in what is considered a patient's best interest between the medical and patient sides, appropriate decision-making can be difficult to achieve. In Japanese clinical settings, decision-making is considered an act of choice-making from multiple potential options. With many ethical dilemmas still remaining, establishing an appropriate decision-making process is an urgent task in modern Japanese healthcare. This paper examines ethical issues related to shared decision-making (SDM) in clinical settings in modern Japan from the psychocultural-social perspective and discusses the ideal decision-making process in present Japan. Specifically, we discuss how five psychocultural-social tendencies - "surmise (Sontaku)," "self-restraint (Jishuku)," "air (atmosphere or mood, Kuuki)," "peer pressure (or tuning pressure, Docho-Atsuryoku)," and "community (Seken)"-which have often been referred to as characteristics of present-day Japanese people, may affect the ideal practice of SDM in Japanese clinical settings. We conclude that health care professionals must be aware of the possible adverse effects of the above Japanese psychocultural-social tendencies on the implementation of SDM and attempt to promote autonomous decision-making, thereby allowing patients to make treatment choices that sufficiently reflect their individual and personal views of life, experiences, goals, preferences, and values.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 150
页数:18
相关论文
共 79 条
[61]  
Sasaki Yuko, 2010, HOSP HOME CARE, V18, P2
[62]   Where Is the Evidence? A Systematic Review of Shared Decision Making and Patient Outcomes [J].
Shay, L. Aubree ;
Lafata, Jennifer Elston .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2015, 35 (01) :114-131
[63]  
Sherwin S., 1998, POLITICS WOMENS HLTH, P19
[64]  
Shimotomai A, 2017, V7, P1
[65]   Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences [J].
Shinkunas, Laura A. ;
Klipowicz, Caleb J. ;
Carlisle, Erica M. .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2020, 20 (01)
[66]   Development and first validation of the shared decision-making questionnaire (SDM-Q) [J].
Simon, D. ;
Schorr, G. ;
Wirtz, M. ;
Vodermaier, A. ;
Caspari, C. ;
Neuner, B. ;
Spies, C. ;
Krones, T. ;
Keller, H. ;
Edwards, A. ;
Loh, A. ;
Haerter, M. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2006, 63 (03) :319-327
[67]   Decision-making models in Japanese psychiatry: Transitions from passive to active patterns [J].
Slingsby, BT .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2004, 59 (01) :83-91
[68]   Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare [J].
Stiggelbout, A. M. ;
Van der Weijden, T. ;
De Wit, M. P. T. ;
Frosch, D. ;
Legare, F. ;
Montori, V. M. ;
Trevena, L. ;
Elwyn, G. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 344
[69]  
Takano, 2019, DANGEROUS MISCHIEF T, P21
[70]   The family-facilitated approach could be dangerous if there is pressure by family dynamics [J].
Tamura, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2006, 6 (01) :16-18