Discussions on Present Japanese Psychocultural-Social Tendencies as Obstacles to Clinical Shared Decision-Making in Japan

被引:13
作者
Asai, Atsushi [1 ]
Okita, Taketoshi [1 ]
Bito, Seiji [2 ]
机构
[1] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Med Eth, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
[2] Natl Hosp Org Tokyo Med Ctr, Div Clin Epidemiol, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Shared decision-making; Japan; Clinical ethics; Autonomy;
D O I
10.1007/s41649-021-00201-2
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
In Japan, where a prominent gap exists in what is considered a patient's best interest between the medical and patient sides, appropriate decision-making can be difficult to achieve. In Japanese clinical settings, decision-making is considered an act of choice-making from multiple potential options. With many ethical dilemmas still remaining, establishing an appropriate decision-making process is an urgent task in modern Japanese healthcare. This paper examines ethical issues related to shared decision-making (SDM) in clinical settings in modern Japan from the psychocultural-social perspective and discusses the ideal decision-making process in present Japan. Specifically, we discuss how five psychocultural-social tendencies - "surmise (Sontaku)," "self-restraint (Jishuku)," "air (atmosphere or mood, Kuuki)," "peer pressure (or tuning pressure, Docho-Atsuryoku)," and "community (Seken)"-which have often been referred to as characteristics of present-day Japanese people, may affect the ideal practice of SDM in Japanese clinical settings. We conclude that health care professionals must be aware of the possible adverse effects of the above Japanese psychocultural-social tendencies on the implementation of SDM and attempt to promote autonomous decision-making, thereby allowing patients to make treatment choices that sufficiently reflect their individual and personal views of life, experiences, goals, preferences, and values.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 150
页数:18
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
ACOG Committee on Ethics, 2021, OBSTET GYNECOL, V137, P34, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004247
[2]  
Aoki Yumi., 2020, JAPANESE B SOCIAL PS, V29, P300, DOI [10.1111/jjns.12365, DOI 10.1111/JJNS.12365]
[3]  
Asai, 2012, KUMAMOTO NICHIN 1230
[4]  
Asai Atsushi, 2021, CBEL REPORT, V4, P15
[5]   'That's the doctor's job': Overcoming patient reluctance to be involved in medical decision making [J].
Blumenthal-Barby, J. S. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2017, 100 (01) :14-17
[6]   Reconciling the theory and reality of shared decision-making: A "matching" approach to practitioner leadership [J].
Brown, Stephen L. ;
Salmon, Peter .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2019, 22 (03) :275-283
[7]  
Chabot, EUTHANASIA LIVE
[8]  
Childress James F, 2020, AMA J Ethics, V22, pE423, DOI 10.1001/amajethics.2020.423
[9]  
Coulter A. C., 2011, Making shared decision-making a reality: No decision about me, without me
[10]   Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in oncology: a systematic review of the literature [J].
Covvey, Jordan R. ;
Kamal, Khalid M. ;
Gorse, Erin E. ;
Mehta, Zumi ;
Dhumal, Trupti ;
Heidari, Elham ;
Rao, Deepika ;
Zacker, Christopher .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2019, 27 (05) :1613-1637