Revisiting the governance of privacy: Contemporary policy instruments in global perspective

被引:39
作者
Bennett, Colin J. [1 ,2 ]
Raab, Charles D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Victoria, Dept Polit Sci, POB 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Social & Polit Sci, Polit & Int Relat, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
data protection; governance; internet; privacy; regulation; DATA PROTECTION; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1111/rego.12222
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The repertoire of policy instruments within a particular policy sector varies by jurisdiction; some "tools of government" are associated with particular administrative and regulatory traditions and political cultures. It is less clear how the instruments associated with a particular policy sector may change over time, as economic, social, and technological conditions evolve. In the early 2000s, we surveyed and analyzed the global repertoire of policy instruments deployed to protect personal data. In this article, we explore how those instruments have changed as a result of 15 years of social, economic and technological transformations, during which the issue has assumed a far higher global profile, as one of the central policy questions associated with modern networked communications. We review the contemporary range of transnational, regulatory, self-regulatory, and technical instruments according to the same framework, and conclude that the types of policy instrument have remained relatively stable, even though they are now deployed on a global scale. While the labels remain the same, however, the conceptual foundations for their legitimation and justification are shifting as greater emphases on accountability, risk, ethics, and the social/political value of privacy have gained purchase. Our analysis demonstrates both continuity and change within the governance of privacy, and displays how we would have tackled the same research project today. As a broader case study of regulation, it highlights the importance of going beyond technical and instrumental labels. Change or stability of policy instruments does not take place in isolation from the wider conceptualizations that shape their meaning, purpose, and effect.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 464
页数:18
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, UN ETH FRAM BIG DAT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, FUTURE PRIVACY PRIVA, V1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, GUID REG METH DE ID
[5]  
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, 2014, 082914EN EUR COMM
[6]  
Bamberger KA, 2015, INFORM POL, P1
[7]   The technology foresight activities of European Union data protection authorities [J].
Barnard-Wills, David .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2017, 116 :142-150
[8]  
Bennett C.J., 2003, GOVERNANCE PRIVACY P
[9]  
Bennett C.J., 2006, GOVERNANCE PRIVACY P
[10]  
Bennett CJ, 2008, PRIVACY ADVOCATES: RESISTING THE SPREAD OF SURVEILLANCE, P1