The interpersonal, cognitive and efficiency domains of clinical teaching: construct validity of a multi-dimensional scale

被引:30
作者
Beckman, TJ
Mandrekar, JN
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Div Gen Internal Med, Dept Internal Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Div Biostat, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
education; medical; undergraduate; standards; teaching; methods; male; female; humans; clinical medicine; interpersonal relations; cognition; Minnesota; educational measurement; observer variation;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02336.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND We are unaware of any hypothesis-driven studies showing that teaching assessments are comprised solely of interpersonal and cognitive domains. Moreover, previous teaching assessments have been biased by heterogeneous samples of evaluators. Consequently, we investigated the construct validity of faculty assessments comprised of interpersonal and cognitive domains, utilising evaluations obtained from resident doctors on an internal medicine hospital service. METHODS A total of 1000 inpatient evaluations were completed on 60 general internal medicine faculty members. Education theory supported a 2-dimensional, 14-item scale. Principal factor analysis was used to explore the scale's dimensionality. Internal reliability and interobserver agreement were determined. Relationships between domains and instructor characteristics were also examined. RESULTS Principal factor analysis revealed interpersonal, clinical teaching and efficiency domains. Internal reliabilities of all domains are high (alpha > 0.90). Interobserver agreement is good (range 0.64-0.83). In the interpersonal domain there is a trend towards higher scores for lower ranking faculty. Significant findings are higher overall scores in the interpersonal domain (P < 0.001), higher scores for assistant professors in the interpersonal domain (P = 0.008) and higher scores for male than female faculty in the interpersonal (P = 0.041) and clinical teaching (P = 0.008) domains. CONCLUSIONS Clinical teaching evaluations are reducible to interpersonal, clinical teaching and efficiency domains. Evidence for construct validity includes predicted domains and high internal and interobserver reliabilities. Utilising a homogenous sample of evaluators minimised variance. Interestingly, lower ranking faculty scored higher in the interpersonal domain, suggesting that lower ranking faculty may focus more attention on teaching activities than full professors do.
引用
收藏
页码:1221 / 1229
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Standards for educational and psychological testing
[2]  
[Anonymous], FREEDOM TO LEARN
[3]   Lessons learned from a peer review of bedside teaching [J].
Beckman, TJ .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2004, 79 (04) :343-346
[4]   A comparison of clinical teaching evaluations by resident and peer physicians [J].
Beckman, TJ ;
Lee, MC ;
Mandrekar, JN .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2004, 26 (04) :321-325
[5]   How reliable are assessments of clinical teaching? A review of the published instruments [J].
Beckman, TJ ;
Ghosh, AK ;
Cook, DA ;
Erwin, PJ ;
Mandrekar, JN .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 19 (09) :971-977
[6]   Evaluating an instrument for the peer review of inpatient teaching [J].
Beckman, TJ ;
Lee, MC ;
Rohren, CH ;
Pankratz, VS .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2003, 25 (02) :131-135
[7]   VALIDITY OF STUDENTS RATINGS OF CLINICAL INSTRUCTORS [J].
BENBASSAT, J ;
BACHAR, E .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1981, 15 (06) :373-376
[8]   Teaching effectiveness of surgeons [J].
Cohen, R ;
MacRae, H ;
Jamieson, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 171 (06) :612-614
[9]   Developing and testing an instrument to measure the effectiveness of clinical teaching in an academic medical center [J].
Copeland, HL ;
Hewson, MG .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2000, 75 (02) :161-166
[10]   Assessing health professionals [J].
Crossley, J ;
Humphris, G ;
Jolly, B .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2002, 36 (09) :800-804