Sustainability that backfires: the case of biogas in Emilia Romagna

被引:27
作者
Cavicchi, Bianca [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Inst Bioecon Res Nibio, POB 115, N-1431 As, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Ctr Technol Innovat & Culture, POB 1108, N-0317 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Triple bottom line; Biogas; Sustainability; Causal processes; Policies; SYSTEM DYNAMICS; TRANSITIONS; PERSPECTIVE; ACCEPTANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eist.2016.02.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The development of a low carbon society does not always deliver sustainable outcomes at local level, as in the case of bioenergy. This paper analyses the impacts of biogas development in Emilia Romagna (Italy) from a social, economic and environmental perspective (triple bottom line). Since 2009, the number of biogas plants has exponentially increased here, following the introduction of the feed-in tariff. Social opposition has been rising since. Therefore, the goal of the study is to investigate the causal processes of biogas development in order to understand what endangered its triple bottom line sustainability. The study does so by employing qualitative system dynamics (i.e. causal loop diagram). Results show that sustainability is threatened by weak local synergies, plants management and equipment deficiencies and agriculture related issues. The analysis suggests that policy interventions should focus on biomass supply and outputs diversification, governance, and social participation. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 27
页数:15
相关论文
共 78 条
[31]   A critical and empirical analysis of the national-local 'gap' in public responses to large-scale energy infrastructures [J].
Batel, Susana ;
Devine-Wright, Patrick .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 58 (06) :1076-1095
[32]   Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion [J].
Batel, Susana ;
Devine-Wright, Patrick ;
Tangeland, Torvald .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 58 :1-5
[33]  
Bianchi P., 1993, European Planning Studies, V1, P25, DOI [10.1080/09654319308720193, DOI 10.1080/09654319308720193]
[34]   The social organization of agricultural biogas production and use [J].
Bluemling, Bettina ;
Mol, Arthur P. J. ;
Tu, Qin .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 63 :10-17
[35]  
BRUSCO S, 1982, CAMBRIDGE J ECON, V6, P167
[36]   Sustainability criteria for bioenergy systems: results from an expert survey [J].
Buchholz, Thomas ;
Luzadis, Valerie A. ;
Volk, Timothy A. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2009, 17 :S86-S98
[37]   A participatory systems approach to modeling social, economic, and ecological components of bioenergy [J].
Buchholz, Thomas S. ;
Volk, Timothy A. ;
Luzadis, Valerie A. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (12) :6084-6094
[38]   Energy production from biogas in the Italian countryside: Policies and organizational models [J].
Carrosio, Giovanni .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 63 :3-9
[39]   Integrating critical thinking and systems thinking: from premises to causal loops [J].
Cavana, RY ;
Mares, ED .
SYSTEM DYNAMICS REVIEW, 2004, 20 (03) :223-235
[40]   A comparison of bioenergy policies and institutional frameworks in the rural areas of Emilia Romagna and Norway [J].
Cavicchi, Bianca ;
Bryden, John M. ;
Vittuari, Matteo .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 67 :355-363