Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process

被引:310
作者
Mikhailov, L
Tsvetinov, P
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Computat, Manchester M60 1QD, Lancs, England
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Informat Syst, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
关键词
service pre-negotiations; multi-criteria decision-making; analytic hierarchy process; fuzzy decision-making; decision support;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2004.04.001
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a new approach for tackling the uncertainty and imprecision of the service evaluation process. Identifying suitable service offers, evaluating the offers and choosing the best alternatives are activities that set the scene for the consequent stages in negotiations and influence in a unique manner the following deliberations. The pre-negotiation problem in negotiations over services is regarded as decision-making under uncertainty, based on multiple criteria of quantitative and qualitative nature, where the imprecise decision-maker's judgements are represented as fuzzy numbers. A new fuzzy modification of the analytic hierarchy process is applied as an evaluation technique. The proposed fuzzy prioritisation method uses fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements rather than exact numerical values of the comparison ratios and transforms the initial fuzzy prioritisation problem into a non-linear program. Unlike the known fuzzy prioritisation techniques, the proposed method derives crisp weights from consistent and inconsistent fuzzy comparison matrices, which eliminates the need of additional aggregation and ranking procedures. A detailed numerical example, illustrating the application of our approach to service evaluation is given. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 33
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, FUZZY SET SYST
[2]  
Bellman R. E., 1971, Decision-making in a fuzzy environment, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141
[3]   MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS WITH FUZZY PAIRWISE COMPARISONS [J].
BOENDER, CGE ;
DEGRAAN, JG ;
LOOTSMA, FA .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 29 (02) :133-143
[4]   A REVIEW OF SOME METHODS FOR RANKING FUZZY SUBSETS [J].
BORTOLAN, G ;
DEGANI, R .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 15 (01) :1-19
[5]   FUZZY HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS [J].
BUCKLEY, JJ .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 17 (03) :233-247
[6]   Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP [J].
Chang, DY .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 95 (03) :649-655
[7]   Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison [J].
Deng, HP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 1999, 21 (03) :215-231
[8]  
Dubois D., 1980, FUZZY SETS SYSTEMS
[9]   Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents [J].
Faratin, P ;
Sierra, C ;
Jennings, NR .
ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, 1998, 24 (3-4) :159-182
[10]   Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations [J].
Faratin, P ;
Sierra, C ;
Jennings, NR .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2002, 142 (02) :205-237