Sustaining Ecological Integrity with Respect to Climate Change: A Fuzzy Adaptive Management Approach

被引:8
作者
Prato, Tony [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Ctr Appl Res & Environm Syst, Marion, MT 59925 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Ecological integrity; Ecological resilience; Climate change; Fuzzy logic; Adaptive management; DECISION-MAKING; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-010-9493-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A fuzzy adaptive management framework is proposed for evaluating the vulnerability of an ecosystem to losing ecological integrity as a result of climate change in an historical period (ex post evaluation) and selecting the best compensatory management action for reducing potential adverse impacts of future climate change on ecological integrity in a future period (ex ante evaluation). The ex post evaluation uses fuzzy logic to test hypotheses about the extent of past ecosystem vulnerability to losing ecological integrity and the ex ante evaluation uses the fuzzy minimax regret criterion to determine the best compensatory management action for alleviating potential adverse impacts of climate change on ecosystem vulnerability to losing ecological integrity in a future period. The framework accounts for uncertainty regarding: (1) the relationship between ecosystem vulnerability to losing ecological integrity and ecosystem resilience; (2) the relationship between ecosystem resilience and the extent to which observed indicators of ecological integrity depart from their thresholds; (3) the extent of future climate change; and (4) the potential impacts of future climate change on ecological integrity and ecosystem resilience. The adaptive management element of the framework involves using the ex post and ex ante evaluations iteratively in consecutive time segments of the future time period to determine if and when it is beneficial to adjust compensatory management actions to climate change. A constructed example is used to demonstrate the framework.
引用
收藏
页码:1344 / 1351
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Evaluating strategies for sustainable development: fuzzy logic reasoning and sensitivity analysis
    Andriantiatsaholiniaina, LA
    Kouikoglou, VS
    Phillis, YA
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 48 (02) : 149 - 172
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, DELPHI METHOD TECHNI
  • [3] Adapting to climate change in Pacific Island Countries: The problem of uncertainty
    Barnett, J
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (06) : 977 - 993
  • [4] Barrett C.R., 1989, Bull. Econ. Res, V41, P229, DOI [10.1111/j.1467-8586, 10.1111/j.1467-8586.1989.tb00341.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1467-8586.1989.TB00341.X]
  • [5] I-VFRP: An interval-valued fuzzy robust programming approach for municipal waste-management planning under uncertainty
    Cai, Y. P.
    Huang, G. H.
    Lu, H. W.
    Yang, Z. F.
    Tan, Q.
    [J]. ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2009, 41 (05) : 399 - 418
  • [6] Fuzzy multiple criteria decision making: Recent developments
    Carlsson, C
    Fuller, R
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1996, 78 (02) : 139 - 153
  • [7] Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment
    Chen, CT
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 114 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [8] Daily G. C., 1997, NATURES SERVICES SOC, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1071/PC000274, 10.1023/a:1023307309124]
  • [9] Marine reserves with ecological uncertainty
    Grafton, RQ
    Kompas, T
    Lindenmayer, D
    [J]. BULLETIN OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY, 2005, 67 (05) : 957 - 971
  • [10] Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245