Contrast ultrasound imaging in liver disease

被引:0
|
作者
Tranquart, F [1 ]
Bleuzen, A
Correas, JM
Kissel, A
Tchuenbou, J
Vandooren, E
机构
[1] CHU Tours, CIT Ultrasons, F-37044 Tours, France
[2] CHU Necker, Serv Radiol, F-75743 Paris, France
[3] Ctr Radiol, F-57000 Metz, France
来源
JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE | 2003年 / 84卷 / 12期
关键词
ultrasonography; US contrast agent; liver; metastasis; hepatocellular carcinoma; hemangioma;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The recent introduction of high-end ultrasound equipments combined with the introduction of contrast agents provides marked improvements in liver imaging for the detection and the characterization of focal lesions. Previous imaging methods were based on high acoustic power and demonstrated improved detection of focal liver lesions. However, good and reliable results were difficult to achieve due to limited number of sweeps, as most of the microbubbles were destroyed within one pass. Non linear imaging methods at low acoustic power allowed great advances in the characterization by limiting signal from background tissue as well as agent collapse allowing continuous imaging starting from the time of contrast injection until complete disappearance of the agent. Contrast-enhanced imaging of the liver follows conventional sonography performed with high standards for detection and localization of lesions using multiple sweeps. Then targeted acquisition is performed for specific lesion characterization after a second contrast injection. Interpretation is based on the presence or not of microbubbles within the lesion (hyper-, hypo- or isosignal) and the delay from injection (arterial, portal or parenchymal or late phase). A well-recognized semiology is reported in this paper. Based on these criteria, sensitivity and specificity are close to those reported with other modalities with accuracy 85-95% for focal liver lesions and 75% for hepatocellular carcinomas. Those results markedly improve ultrasound accuracy compared to conventional sonography, and so put contrast-enhanced sonography among recommended non-invasive imaging methods for focal liver lesions with changes in diagnostic strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:2025 / 2040
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrasound contrast agents in liver imaging
    Leen, E
    McArdle, CS
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1996, 51 : 35 - 39
  • [2] Contrast enhanced ultrasound in liver imaging
    Nielsen, MB
    Bang, N
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2004, 51 : S3 - S8
  • [3] Molecular imaging of disease with targeted contrast ultrasound imaging
    Inaba, Yoichi
    Lindner, Jonathan R.
    TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 159 (03) : 140 - 148
  • [4] Ultrasound contrast agents in diagnostics of liver disease
    Lemke, AJ
    Chopra, SS
    Niehues, SM
    Felix, R
    RADIOLOGE, 2005, 45 (06): : 520 - 528
  • [5] Updated contrast ultrasound imaging in focal liver lesions
    Tranquart, F
    Correas, JM
    Bleuzen, A
    Tchuenbou, J
    GASTROENTEROLOGIE CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE, 2004, 28 (04): : 337 - 349
  • [6] A PARTICULATE CONTRAST AGENT WITH POTENTIAL FOR ULTRASOUND IMAGING OF LIVER
    PARKER, KJ
    TUTHILL, TA
    LERNER, RM
    VIOLANTE, MR
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1987, 13 (09): : 555 - 566
  • [7] Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Liver Imaging: Recent Advances
    Salvatore, Veronica
    Borghi, Alberto
    Piscaglia, Fabio
    CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN, 2012, 18 (15) : 2236 - 2252
  • [8] Parametric imaging of contrast ultrasound for the evaluation of neovascularization in liver tumors
    Sugimoto, Katsutoshi
    Moriyasu, Fuminori
    Kamiyama, Naohisa
    Metoki, Ryo
    Iijima, Hiroko
    HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, 2007, 37 (06) : 464 - 472
  • [9] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound applications in liver transplant imaging
    Giuseppe Como
    Luca Montaldo
    Umberto Baccarani
    Dario Lorenzin
    Chiara Zuiani
    Rossano Girometti
    Abdominal Radiology, 2021, 46 : 84 - 95
  • [10] Quantitative contrast harmonic ultrasound imaging of normal canine liver
    Ziegler, LE
    O'Brien, RT
    Waller, KR
    Zagzebski, JA
    VETERINARY RADIOLOGY & ULTRASOUND, 2003, 44 (04) : 451 - 454