Revisit Rates and Associated Costs After an Emergency Department Encounter A Multistate Analysis

被引:110
作者
Duseja, Reena
Bardach, Naomi S.
Lin, Grace A.
Yazdany, Jinoos
Dean, Mitzi L.
Clay, Theodore H.
Boscardin, W. John
Dudley, R. Adams
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94118 USA
[2] Philip R Lee Inst Hlth Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
RETURN VISITS; HOSPITALIZATION;
D O I
10.7326/M14-1616
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Return visits to the emergency department (ED) or hospital after an index ED visit strain the health system, but information about rates and determinants of revisits is limited. Objective: To describe revisit rates, variation in revisit rates by diagnosis and state, and associated costs. Design: Observational study using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project databases. Setting: 6 U.S. states. Patients: Adults with ED visits between 2006 and 2010. Measurements: Revisit rates and costs. Results: Within 3 days of an index ED visit, 8.2% of patients had a revisit; 32% of those revisits occurred at a different institution. Revisit rates varied by diagnosis, with skin infections having the highest rate. (23.1% [95% Cl, 22.3% to 23.9%]). Revisit rates also varied by state. For skin infections, Florida had higher risk-adjusted revisit rates (24.8% [Cl, 23.5% to 26.2%]) than Nebraska (10.6% [Cl, 9.2% to 12.1%]). In Florida, the only state with complete cost data, total revisit costs for the 19.8% of patients with a revisit within 30 days were 118% of total index ED visit costs for all patients (including those with and without a revisit). Limitation: Whether a revisit reflects inadequate access to primary care, a planned revisit, the patient's nonadherence to ED recommendations, or poor-quality care at the initial ED visit remains unknown. Conclusion: Revisits after an index ED encounter are more frequent than previously reported, in part because many occur outside the index institution. Among ED patients in Florida, more resources are spent on revisits than on index ED visits.
引用
收藏
页码:750 / 756
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CLIN CLASS SOFTW CCS
[2]  
[Anonymous], MATT URG RED EM DEP
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010 CENS DAT
[4]   Launching Accountable Care Organizations - The Proposed Rule for the Medicare Shared Savings Program [J].
Berwick, Donald M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 364 (16) :1
[5]   Repeat patients to the emergency department in a Statewide database [J].
Cook, LJ ;
Knight, S ;
Junkins, EP ;
Mann, NC ;
Dean, JM ;
Olson, LM .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2004, 11 (03) :256-263
[6]  
Demnati A, 2004, SURV METHODOL, V30, P17
[7]  
Deville JC, 1999, SURV METHODOL, V28, P193
[8]   The implications of regional variations in medicare spending. Part 1: The content, quality, and accessibility of care [J].
Fisher, ES ;
Wennberg, DE ;
Stukel, TA ;
Gottlieb, DJ ;
Lucas, FL ;
Pinder, EL .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (04) :273-287
[9]   Early revisit, hospitalization, or death among older persons discharged from the ED [J].
Friedmann, PD ;
Jin, L ;
Karrison, TG ;
Hayley, DC ;
Mulliken, R ;
Walter, J ;
Chin, MH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 19 (02) :125-129
[10]   Frequent users of Massachusetts emergency departments: A statewide analysis [J].
Fuda, Kathleen Kerwin ;
Immekus, Rachel .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 48 (01) :9-16