Treatment of distal ureteral stricture by laparoscopic ureterovesical reimplantation

被引:1
|
作者
Nunez-Mora, C. [1 ]
Garcia-Mediero, J. M. [1 ]
Cabrera, P. M. [1 ]
Hernandez, E.
Garcia-Tello, A.
Angulo, J. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Europea Madrid, Serv Urol, Serv Madrileno Salud, Fdn Invest Biomed,Hosp Univ Getafe,MD Anderson In, Madrid, Spain
来源
ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS | 2011年 / 35卷 / 01期
关键词
Ureteric stricture; Laparoscopy; Reconstructive surgery; VESICOURETERAL REFLUX; URETERONEOCYSTOSTOMY; TRIGONOPLASTY; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; HITCH;
D O I
10.1016/S2173-5786(11)70009-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: to analyse the results achieved to treat iliac or pelvic ureteric stricture using laparoscopic reimplantation of the ureter in a psoic bladder. Material and method: in a four-year period, we performed laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in a psoic bladder in 6 patients (right/left 1:1; male/female 1:2; mean age 59.2 years, range 47-87). In 4 cases the lesion was iatrogenic and in 2 cases idiopathic. Ureteral resection with bladder cuff and cystorraphy followed by ipsilateral lymph node dissection was performed in idiopathic cases or those with history of previous urothelial tumour (4 cases in total) before ureteral reimplantation. Bladder was extensively mobilized and fixed to minor psoas tendon before performing ureteroneocystostomy. Mixed intra and extravesical technique with submucosal tunnel (Politano) was used in a case and in the remaining 5 cases extravesical technique with submucosal tunnel (Goodwin) was used. Mean follow-up was 26 months (range 18-34). Results: there was no need to convert to open surgery. Time of surgery was 230 minutes in the case treated with Politano ureteroneocystostomy and 120 (range 75-150) in those treated purely extravesically. The mean hospital stay was 3.2 days (range 2-5). There were no intra or postoperative complications. Histologic assessment always revealed ureteral fibrosis and in 2 cases accompanying granulomatous inflammation and dysplasia. No patient suffered re-stricture or impairment in renal function during follow-up. Conclusions: laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation is an effective and safe minimally invasive technique to treat benign distal stricture of the ureter. Simplicity of extravesical reimplantation has an advantage over its intravesical counterpart. (C) 2010 AEU. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 36
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Comparison of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureteral Reimplantation and Conventional Laparoscopic Ureteral Reimplantation for the Management of Benign Distal Ureteral Stricture
    Zhang, Yucong
    Ouyang, Wei
    Xu, Hao
    Luan, Yang
    Yang, Jun
    Lu, Yuchao
    Hu, Jia
    Liu, Zheng
    Yu, Xiao
    Guan, Wei
    Hu, Zhiquan
    Wang, Shaogang
    Ye, Zhangqun
    Li, Heng
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 17 (03) : 252 - 256
  • [2] Intracorporeal Tapering of the Ureter for Distal Ureteral Stricture Before Laparoscopic Ureteral Reimplantation
    Nouralizadeh, Akbar
    Simforoosh, Nasser
    Zare, Samad
    Ghahestani, Seyyed Mohammad
    Soltani, Mohammad Hossein
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2010, 7 (04) : 238 - 242
  • [3] Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation
    Gonzalez Rodriguez, Ivan
    Gil Ugarteburu, Rodrigo
    Fernandez-Pello Montes, Sergio
    Diaz Mendez, Begona
    Blanco Fernandez, Rebeca
    Mosquera Madera, Javier
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2017, 70 (04): : 412 - 421
  • [4] Laparoscopic Boari Flap ureteral reimplantation
    Castillon-Vela, Ignacio
    del Pozo Jimenez, Gema
    Turo Antona, Jorge
    Vazquez Alba, David
    Saenz Medina, Javier
    Carballido Rodriguez, Joaquin
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2017, 70 (04): : 436 - 444
  • [5] Ureteral Reimplantation via Robotic Nontransecting Side-to-Side Anastomosis for Distal Ureteral Stricture
    Slawin, Jeremy
    Patel, Neel H.
    Lee, Ziho
    Dy, Geolani W.
    Kim, Daniel
    Asghar, Aeen
    Koster, Helaine
    Metro, Michael
    Zhao, Lee
    Stifelman, Michael
    Eun, Daniel D.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2020, 34 (08) : 836 - 839
  • [6] Laparoscopic Ureteral Reimplantation: Technique and Outcomes
    Seideman, Casey A.
    Huckabay, Chad
    Smith, Kevin D.
    Permpongkosol, Sompol
    Nadjafi-Semnani, Mohammad
    Lee, Benjamin R.
    Richstone, Lee
    Kavoussi, Louis R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04) : 1742 - 1746
  • [7] Laparoscopic Ureteral Reimplant for Ureteral Stricture
    Soares, Rodrigo S. Q.
    de Abreu, Rubens A., Jr.
    Tavora, Jose E. F.
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2010, 36 (01): : 38 - 43
  • [8] Robotic Versus Open Distal Ureteral Reconstruction and Reimplantation for Benign Stricture Disease
    Kozinn, Spencer I.
    Canes, David
    Sorcini, Andrea
    Moinzadeh, Alireza
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 (02) : 147 - 151
  • [9] Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation: prospective evaluation of medium-term results and current developments
    Gozen, Ali Serdar
    Cresswell, Joanne
    Canda, Abdullah Erdem
    Ganta, Suresh
    Rassweiler, Jens
    Teber, Dogu
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 28 (02) : 221 - 226
  • [10] Ureteral Advancement in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation for Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux
    Kojima, Yoshiyuki
    Mizuno, Kentaro
    Umemoto, Yukihiro
    Yasui, Takahiro
    Hayashi, Yutaro
    Kohri, Kenjiro
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 188 (02) : 582 - 587