Evaluation of Stadium Locations Using AHP and TOPSIS Methods

被引：0

作者：

Karakopru, Ugur Orhan ^{[1
]}

Kabadurmus, Ozgur ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Nisantasi Univ IIBF, Uluslararasi Ticaret & Lojist Bolumu, Istanbul, Turkey

[2] Yasar Univ, Isletme Fak, Uluslararasi Lojist Yonetimi Bolumu, Bornova, Turkey

来源：

ESKISEHIR OSMANGAZI UNIVERSITESI IIBF DERGISI-ESKISEHIR OSMANGAZI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES | 2020年 / 15卷 / 01期

关键词：

Multi-Criteria Decision Making; Logistics; Sports Clubs; Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); TOPSIS; FUZZY TOPSIS; SPORTS FACILITIES; ECONOMIC-IMPACT; SELECTION; MANAGEMENT; BENEFITS; ARENAS; TEAMS;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

With the industrialization of sports, stadiums started to mean more than a venue for playing games. Therefore, choosing the best location for a stadium is an important problem for sports clubs. In this paper, a two-step hierarchical multi-criteria decision-making model has been developed to evaluate stadium locations. In the first step, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) has been used to determine the criteria weights. In the second step, TOPSIS has been used to evaluate the alternatives. Four main criteria have been identified to evaluate alternatives: (1) stadium capacity, (2) construction cost, (3) accessibility and (4) distances. As a case study, the proposed model has been applied to three new stadium constructions in Izmir, Turkey.

引用

页码：1 / 16

页数：16

共 50 条

[41] A business process decision model for client evaluation using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS
Hmu Tin K.M.M.
Lau H.
Lau, Henry (h.lau@uws.edu.au), 1600, Inderscience Publishers, 29, route de Pre-Bois, Case Postale 856, CH-1215 Geneva 15, CH-1215, Switzerland (35): : 80 - 99
[42] Prioritizing EU Projects by Using Decomposed Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS
Onar, Sezi Cevik
Cebi, Selcuk
Oztaysi, Basar
Kahraman, Cengiz
JOURNAL OF MULTIPLE-VALUED LOGIC AND SOFT COMPUTING, 2024, 43 (4-6) : 425 - 452
[43] Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approaches to prioritizing solutions for reverse logistics barriers
Sirisawat, Pornwasin
Kiatcharoenpol, Tossapol
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 117 : 303 - 318
[44] Selecting sustainable supplier countries for Iran's steel industry at three levels by using AHP and TOPSIS methods
Azimifard, Arezoo
Moosavirad, Seyed Hamed
Ariafar, Shahram
RESOURCES POLICY, 2018, 57 : 30 - 44
[45] An Industry 4.0 Technology Selection Framework for Manufacturing Systems and Firms Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods
Pour, Parham Dadash
Ahmed, Aser Alaa
Nazzal, Mohammad A.
Darras, Basil M.
SYSTEMS, 2023, 11 (04):
[46] An Integrated Intuitionistic Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS Approach to Evaluation of Outsource Manufacturers
Kahraman, Cengiz
Oztaysi, Basar
Onar, Sezi Cevik
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2020, 29 (01) : 283 - 297
[47] An Overview of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and the Applications of AHP and TOPSIS Methods
Chaube, Shshank
Pant, Sangeeta
Kumar, Anuj
Uniyal, Shaurya
Singh, Manoj Kumar
Kotecha, Ketan
Kumar, Akshay
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, 2024, 9 (03) : 581 - 615
[48] A comparison between fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to software requirements selection
Nazim, Mohd.
Mohammad, Chaudhary Wali
Sadiq, Mohd.
ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2022, 61 (12) : 10851 - 10870
[49] REGIONAL DISPARITIES EVALUATION USING ENTROPY AND TOPSIS METHODS
Minarcikova, Eva
HRADEC ECONOMIC DAYS, VOL 5(5), 2015, 5 : 23 - 30
[50] Grading of architectural heritage using AHP and TOPSIS methods: a case of Odishan Temple, India
Mishra, Partha Sarathi
Muhuri, Soumi
JOURNAL OF CULTURAL HERITAGE MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 12 (04) : 444 - 477

← 1 2 3 4 5 →