Evaluation of Stadium Locations Using AHP and TOPSIS Methods

被引:0
作者
Karakopru, Ugur Orhan [1 ]
Kabadurmus, Ozgur [2 ]
机构
[1] Nisantasi Univ IIBF, Uluslararasi Ticaret & Lojist Bolumu, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Yasar Univ, Isletme Fak, Uluslararasi Lojist Yonetimi Bolumu, Bornova, Turkey
来源
ESKISEHIR OSMANGAZI UNIVERSITESI IIBF DERGISI-ESKISEHIR OSMANGAZI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES | 2020年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
Multi-Criteria Decision Making; Logistics; Sports Clubs; Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); TOPSIS; FUZZY TOPSIS; SPORTS FACILITIES; ECONOMIC-IMPACT; SELECTION; MANAGEMENT; BENEFITS; ARENAS; TEAMS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
With the industrialization of sports, stadiums started to mean more than a venue for playing games. Therefore, choosing the best location for a stadium is an important problem for sports clubs. In this paper, a two-step hierarchical multi-criteria decision-making model has been developed to evaluate stadium locations. In the first step, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) has been used to determine the criteria weights. In the second step, TOPSIS has been used to evaluate the alternatives. Four main criteria have been identified to evaluate alternatives: (1) stadium capacity, (2) construction cost, (3) accessibility and (4) distances. As a case study, the proposed model has been applied to three new stadium constructions in Izmir, Turkey.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of Arc Welding Process Through the Combination of TOPSIS-AHP Methods with Fuzzy Logic
    Sanchez-Lozano, Juan M.
    Meseguer-Valdenebro, Jose L.
    Portoles, Antonio
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE INDIAN INSTITUTE OF METALS, 2017, 70 (04) : 935 - 946
  • [32] Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection
    Ertugrul, Irfan
    Karakasoglu, Nilsen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 39 (7-8) : 783 - 795
  • [33] Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection
    İrfan Ertuğrul
    Nilsen Karakaşoğlu
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2008, 39 : 783 - 795
  • [34] Integrating the AHP and TOPSIS methods to select accounting staff
    Nguyen, Anh Tuan
    Van Tuyen, Vo
    DECISION SCIENCE LETTERS, 2025, 14 (02) : 473 - 482
  • [35] Quantifying risks in a supply chain through integration of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS
    Samvedi, Avinash
    Jain, Vipul
    Chan, Felix T. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2013, 51 (08) : 2433 - 2442
  • [36] Determining Online Travel Planning with AHP and TOPSIS Methods
    Eren, Abdullah
    Khorsheed, Heersh Azeez
    ACTA INFOLOGICA, 2023, 7 (01):
  • [37] Assessment of the vulnerability to groundwater contamination by AHP and TOPSIS methods
    Tedesco, Adriana Maria
    Oliveira, Gilson Adamczuk
    Trojan, Flavio
    ENGENHARIA SANITARIA E AMBIENTAL, 2021, 26 (03) : 401 - 407
  • [38] Evaluation of Geosites in Changbaishan Global Geopark based on Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS
    Li, Jiaming
    He, Jinxin
    Lu, Peng
    Ran, Xiangjin
    Yi, Jian
    GEOHERITAGE, 2025, 17 (02)
  • [39] Evaluation and selection of mobile health (mHealth) applications using AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS
    Rajak, Manindra
    Shaw, Krishnendu
    TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2019, 59
  • [40] A Group Expert Evaluation for Teachers by Integrating Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS Models
    Pavani, Sirigiri
    Sharma, Lokesh Kumar
    Hota, H. S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE IN MOOC, INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION (MITE), 2013, : 85 - +