Evaluation of Stadium Locations Using AHP and TOPSIS Methods

被引：0

作者：

Karakopru, Ugur Orhan ^{[1
]}

Kabadurmus, Ozgur ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Nisantasi Univ IIBF, Uluslararasi Ticaret & Lojist Bolumu, Istanbul, Turkey

[2] Yasar Univ, Isletme Fak, Uluslararasi Lojist Yonetimi Bolumu, Bornova, Turkey

来源：

ESKISEHIR OSMANGAZI UNIVERSITESI IIBF DERGISI-ESKISEHIR OSMANGAZI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES | 2020年 / 15卷 / 01期

关键词：

Multi-Criteria Decision Making; Logistics; Sports Clubs; Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); TOPSIS; FUZZY TOPSIS; SPORTS FACILITIES; ECONOMIC-IMPACT; SELECTION; MANAGEMENT; BENEFITS; ARENAS; TEAMS;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

With the industrialization of sports, stadiums started to mean more than a venue for playing games. Therefore, choosing the best location for a stadium is an important problem for sports clubs. In this paper, a two-step hierarchical multi-criteria decision-making model has been developed to evaluate stadium locations. In the first step, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) has been used to determine the criteria weights. In the second step, TOPSIS has been used to evaluate the alternatives. Four main criteria have been identified to evaluate alternatives: (1) stadium capacity, (2) construction cost, (3) accessibility and (4) distances. As a case study, the proposed model has been applied to three new stadium constructions in Izmir, Turkey.

引用

页码：1 / 16

页数：16

共 50 条

[21] ISA Evaluation Framework for Security of Internet of Health Things System Using AHP-TOPSIS Methods
Wang, Lanjing
Ali, Yasir
Nazir, Shah
Niazi, Mahmood
IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 152316 - 152332
[22] A hybrid fuzzy-AHP-TOPSIS model for evaluation of manufacturing relocation decisions
Sequeira, Movin
Adlemo, Anders
Hilletofth, Per
OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (01) : 164 - 191
[23] An Integrated Approach of Fuzzy-AHP-TOPSIS for E-commerce Evaluation
Tran Thi Tham
Hong-Phuc Nguyen
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, 2021, 20 (02): : 82 - 95
[24] Generic Method for SDN Controller Selection Using AHP and TOPSIS Methods
Durkadevi, K.
Revathi, T.
Shenbagalakshmi, G.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2022, 21 (03) : 1031 - 1059
[25] EVALUATION OF WHEEL LOADERS IN OPEN PIT MARBLE QUARRYING BY USING THE AHP AND TOPSIS APPROACHES
Kun, Mete
Topaloglu, Seyda
Malli, Tahir
ARCHIVES OF MINING SCIENCES, 2013, 58 (01) : 255 - 267
[26] A hybrid of Delphi, AHP and TOPSIS Methods for project portfolio management
Borjy, Ahmad
Baradaran, Vahid
Zandi, Peyman
Taheri, Milad
JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2019, 4 (02) : 141 - 156
[27] Classification of Marble Blocks Using AHP Assisted TOPSIS and GRA Methods
Ersoy, Metin
JOURNAL OF POLYTECHNIC-POLITEKNIK DERGISI, 2019, 22 (02): : 303 - 317
[28] An evaluation of quality goals by using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology
Tadic, Danijela
Gumus, Alev Taskin
Arsovski, Slavko
Aleksic, Aleksandar
Stefanovic, Miladin
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2013, 25 (03) : 547 - 556
[29] Student Orientation Recommender System using TOPSIS and AHP
Ouatik, Farouk
Erritali, Mohammed
Ouatik, Fahd
Jourhmane, Mostafa
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND ORGANIZATIONAL SCIENCES, 2022, 46 (02) : 473 - 489
[30] Wind turbine evaluation using the hesitant fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method with a case in Turkey
Beskese, Ahmet
Camci, Alper
Temur, Gul Tekin
Erturk, Ercan
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 38 (01) : 997 - 1011

← 1 2 3 4 5 →