Evaluation of Stadium Locations Using AHP and TOPSIS Methods

被引:0
作者
Karakopru, Ugur Orhan [1 ]
Kabadurmus, Ozgur [2 ]
机构
[1] Nisantasi Univ IIBF, Uluslararasi Ticaret & Lojist Bolumu, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Yasar Univ, Isletme Fak, Uluslararasi Lojist Yonetimi Bolumu, Bornova, Turkey
来源
ESKISEHIR OSMANGAZI UNIVERSITESI IIBF DERGISI-ESKISEHIR OSMANGAZI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES | 2020年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
Multi-Criteria Decision Making; Logistics; Sports Clubs; Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); TOPSIS; FUZZY TOPSIS; SPORTS FACILITIES; ECONOMIC-IMPACT; SELECTION; MANAGEMENT; BENEFITS; ARENAS; TEAMS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
With the industrialization of sports, stadiums started to mean more than a venue for playing games. Therefore, choosing the best location for a stadium is an important problem for sports clubs. In this paper, a two-step hierarchical multi-criteria decision-making model has been developed to evaluate stadium locations. In the first step, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) has been used to determine the criteria weights. In the second step, TOPSIS has been used to evaluate the alternatives. Four main criteria have been identified to evaluate alternatives: (1) stadium capacity, (2) construction cost, (3) accessibility and (4) distances. As a case study, the proposed model has been applied to three new stadium constructions in Izmir, Turkey.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Academic Research Projects Using AHP and TOPSIS Methods
    Aribas, Murat
    Ozcan, Ugur
    JOURNAL OF POLYTECHNIC-POLITEKNIK DERGISI, 2016, 19 (02): : 163 - 173
  • [2] Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    Yavuz, Serkan
    Kilinc, Nevzat
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (04) : 8143 - 8151
  • [3] The evaluation of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Turkish manufacturing sector using AHP-TOPSIS methods
    Ozguner, Zeynep
    Ozguner, Mert
    Durmaz, Yakup
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, 2023, 38 (07) : 1562 - 1573
  • [4] Performance Evaluation for Sustainability of Strong Smart Grid by Using Stochastic AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods
    Zhao, Huiru
    Li, Nana
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (02)
  • [5] OPERATING SYSTEM SELECTION USING FUZZY AHP AND TOPSIS METHODS
    Balli, Serkan
    Korukoglu, Serdar
    MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL APPLICATIONS, 2009, 14 (02) : 119 - 130
  • [6] A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods
    Sun, Chia-Chi
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (12) : 7745 - 7754
  • [7] Evaluation of Radio Management Based on TOPSIS and AHP Methods
    Zong, Rong
    Wang, Ping
    Sun, Zhuo
    Cai, Guanghui
    Tang, Hao
    Liu, Yijun
    15TH CONFERENCE ON THE WIRELESS ACROSS THE TAIWAN STRAITS, PROCEEDINGS, 2010, : 105 - +
  • [8] Using TOPSIS and AHP Methods in Job Distribution to Subcontractors in Apparel Companies and Comparing the Results
    Bulur, Oyku Ceren
    Kayar, Mahmut
    FIBRES & TEXTILES IN EASTERN EUROPE, 2021, 29 (04) : 24 - 31
  • [9] Logistics Center Location Optimisation in Thrace: A Hybrid Approach Using AHP and TOPSIS Methods
    Oguztimur, Senay
    Kilicarslan, Gizem Nur
    Alici, Ecem
    Serdengecti, Kamil
    PLANLAMA-PLANNING, 2023, 33 (02): : 251 - 265
  • [10] Integration of GIS, AHP and TOPSIS for earthquake hazard analysis
    Nyimbili, Penjani Hopkins
    Erden, Turan
    Karaman, Himmet
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2018, 92 (03) : 1523 - 1546