Memantine for Alzheimer's Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:167
作者
Kishi, Taro [1 ]
Matsunaga, Shinji [1 ]
Oya, Kazuto [1 ]
Nomura, Ikuo [1 ]
Ikuta, Toshikazu [2 ]
Iwata, Nakao [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujita Hlth Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, 1-98 Dengakugakubo,Kutsukake Cho, Toyoake, Aichi 4701192, Japan
[2] Univ Mississippi, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Sch Appl Sci, University, MS 38677 USA
关键词
Alzheimer's disease; behavioral disturbances; cognitive function; memantine; meta-analysis; systematic review; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; DOUBLE-BLIND; MODERATE; DONEPEZIL; TOLERABILITY; RECEPTORS; INVENTORY; EFFICACY; BRAIN;
D O I
10.3233/JAD-170424
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: The clinical benefit of memantine for Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains inconclusive. Objective: We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy/safety of memantine in AD. Methods: We included randomized trials of memantine for AD patients. Cognitive function scores (CF), behavioral disturbances scores (BD), and all-cause discontinuation were used as primary measures. Effect size based on a random-effects model was evaluated in the meta-analyses. Results: Thirty studies (n = 7,567; memantine versus placebo: N = 11, n = 3,298; memantine + cholinesterase inhibitors (M+ChEIs) versus ChEIs: N = 17, n = 4,175) were identified. Memantine showed a significant improvement in CF [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.24, 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) = -0.34, -0.15, p < 0.00001, I-2 = 35%] and BD (SMD = -0.16, 95% CIs = -0.29, -0.04, p = 0.01, I-2 = 52%) compared with placebo. In the sensitivity analysis including only patients with moderate-severe AD, memantine was superior to the placebo in reducing BD without considerable heterogeneity (SMD = -0.20, 95% CIs = -0.34, -0.07, p = 0.003, I-2 = 36%). Compared with ChEIs, M+ ChEIs showed a greater reduction in BD (SMD = -0.20, 95% CIs = -0.36, -0.03, p = 0.02, I-2 = 77%) and a trend of CF improvement (SMD = -0.11, 95% CIs = -0.22, 0.01, p = 0.06, I-2 = 56%). However, in the sensitivity analysis of double-blind, placebo-controlled studies only, M+ ChEIs showed a significant reduction in BD compared with ChEIs without considerable heterogeneity(SMD = -0.11, 95% CIs = -0.21, -0.01, p = 0.04, I-2 = 40%). When performing the sensitivity analysis of donepezil studies only, M+ ChEIs was superior to ChEIs in improving CF without considerable heterogeneity (SMD = -0.18, 95% CIs = -0.31, -0.05, p = 0.006, I-2 = 49%). No differences were detected in all-cause discontinuation between the groups. Conclusions: The meta-analyses suggest the credible efficacy and safety of memantine in treating AD when used alone or in combination with ChEIs.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 425
页数:25
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MA3301
[2]  
[Anonymous], NCT00933608
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, JPN J GERIATR PSYCHI
[4]  
[Anonymous], JPN J GERIATR MED
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, REV MAN REVMAN COMP
[6]  
[Anonymous], J AMINO ACIDS
[7]  
[Anonymous], MODERN PRACTICAL MED
[8]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[9]  
[Anonymous], IE2201
[10]  
[Anonymous], NCT00097916