Beyond the Learning Curve of Prostate MRI/TRUS Target Fusion Biopsy after More than 1000 Procedures

被引:14
作者
Checcucci, Enrico [1 ]
Piramide, Federico
Amparore, Daniele
De Cillis, Sabrina
Granato, Stefano
Sica, Michele
Verri, Paolo
Volpi, Gabriele
Piana, Alberto
Garrou, Diletta
Manfredi, Matteo
Fiori, Cristian
Porpiglia, Francesco
机构
[1] Univ Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hosp, Div Urol, Dept Oncol, Reg Gonzole 10, I-10043 Turin, Italy
关键词
CANCER DETECTION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; RECOMMENDATIONS; GUIDELINES; UROLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2021.06.021
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the learning curve (LC) of two urology residents in the execution of fusion biopsy (FB) in terms of overall prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant (cs) PCa detection rate (DR) and according to different characteristics of the lesions on MRI MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed data from our prospective maintained FB database between January 2015 and December 2019. FB was performed using the BioJet fusion system (D&K Technologies, Barum, Germany) with a transrectal or transperineal approach. An ANOVA test was used to evaluate the homogeneity of our cohort. Multivariable linear and logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate the relationship between operator experience and DR for PCa and csPCa. Then, the postprocedural complication rate trend was evaluated. RESULTS 1005 patients were included. The overall DR of PCa was 61.2% (615/1005) [IC 0.58 - 0.64]; whilst DR for csPCA was 54.6% (549/1005) [IC 0.51 - 0.57]. Operator experience does not seem to influence the DR of overall PCa and csPCa; whilst for lesions <8 mm in diameter, PCa and csPCa DR increased significantly with operator experience (P = 0.048 and P = 0.038, respectively). Postprocedural complications remained stable during the whole study period (P = 0.75). CONCLUSION A standardized FB approach turned out to be feasible, safe, and effective since the beginning of the residents' LC. PCa and csPCa DR remained stable, at 60% and 55% respectively, after more than 1,000 biopsies. However, for lesions smaller than 8 mm, at least 100 FB of experience is needed to correctly sample the area. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 45
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Interactive dedicated training curriculum improves accuracy in the interpretation of MR imaging of prostate cancer [J].
Akin, Oguz ;
Riedl, Christopher C. ;
Ishill, Nicole M. ;
Moskowitz, Chaya S. ;
Zhang, Jingbo ;
Hricak, Hedvig .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (04) :995-1002
[2]  
[Anonymous], EAU GUIDELINES
[3]   Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Weinreb, Jeffrey C. ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Thoeny, Harriet C. ;
Tempany, Clare M. ;
Shtern, Faina ;
Padhani, Anwar R. ;
Margolis, Daniel ;
Macura, Katarzyna J. ;
Haider, Masoom A. ;
Cornud, Francois ;
Choyke, Peter L. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) :41-49
[4]   ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Clements, Richard ;
Choyke, Peter ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) :746-757
[5]   Changes in prostate cancer detection rate of MRI-TRUS fusion vs systematic biopsy over time: evidence of a learning curve [J].
Calio, B. ;
Sidana, A. ;
Sugano, D. ;
Gaur, S. ;
Jain, A. ;
Maruf, M. ;
Xu, S. ;
Yan, P. ;
Kruecker, J. ;
Merino, M. ;
Choyke, P. ;
Turkbey, B. ;
Wood, B. ;
Pinto, P. .
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2017, 20 (04) :436-441
[6]   Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure [J].
Cash, Hannes ;
Guenzel, Karsten ;
Maxeiner, Andreas ;
Stephan, Carsten ;
Fischer, Thomas ;
Durmus, Tahir ;
Miller, Kurt ;
Asbach, Patrick ;
Haas, Matthias ;
Kempkensteffen, Carsten .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 118 (01) :35-43
[7]   Naive patients with suspicious prostate cancer and positive multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI): is it time for fusion target biopsy alone? [J].
Checcucci, Enrico ;
De Cillis, Sabrina ;
Amparore, Daniele ;
Garrou, Diletta ;
Aimar, Roberta ;
Piana, Alberto ;
Piramide, Federico ;
Granato, Stefano ;
Cattaneo, Giovanni ;
Manfredi, Matteo ;
Fiori, Cristian ;
Bollito, Enrico ;
Stura, Ilaria ;
Migliaretti, Giuseppe ;
Porpiglia, Francesco .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2023, 16 (04) :280-287
[8]   The role of additional standard biopsy in the MRI-targeted biopsy era [J].
Checcucci, Enrico ;
De Cillis, Sabrina ;
Piramide, Federico ;
Amparore, Daniele ;
Kasivisvanathan, Veeru ;
Giganti, Francesco ;
Fiori, Cristian ;
Moore, Caroline M. ;
Porpiglia, Francesco .
MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2020, 72 (05) :637-639
[9]   Applications of neural networks in urology: a systematic review [J].
Checcucci, Enrico ;
De Cillis, Sabrina ;
Granato, Stefano ;
Chang, Peter ;
Afyouni, Andrew Shea ;
Okhunov, Zhamshid .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2020, 30 (06) :788-807
[10]   Artificial intelligence and neural networks in urology: current clinical applications [J].
Checcucci, Enrico ;
Autorino, Riccardo ;
Cacciamani, Giovanni E. ;
Amparore, Daniele ;
De Cillis, Sabrina ;
Piana, Alberto ;
Piazzolla, Pietro ;
Vezzetti, Enrico ;
Fiori, Cristian ;
Veneziano, Domenico ;
Tewari, Ash ;
Dasgupta, Prokar ;
Hung, Andrew ;
Gill, Inderbir ;
Porpiglia, Francesco .
MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2020, 72 (01) :49-57