Electronic and paper versions of a faces pain intensity scale: concordance and preference in hospitalized children

被引:31
作者
Wood, Chantal [1 ]
von Baeyer, Carl L. [2 ,3 ]
Falinower, Sylvain [4 ]
Moyse, Dominique
Annequin, Daniel [5 ]
Legout, Valerie [6 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Univ Robert Debre, Pain Unit, F-75019 Paris, France
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Psychol, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W0, Canada
[3] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Pediat, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[4] A4 SAS Agcy, Med Knowledge Management, F-92320 Chatillon, France
[5] Armand Trousseau Childrens Hosp, Pediat Pain Unit, F-75019 Paris, France
[6] Labs Grunenthal, F-92300 Levallois Perret, France
关键词
SELF-REPORT; CLINICAL-TRIALS; PEDIATRIC PAIN; VISUAL ANALOG; DIARY; FEASIBILITY; ADOLESCENTS;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2431-11-87
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: Assessment of pain in children is an important aspect of pain management and can be performed by observational methods or by self-assessment. The Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) is a self-report tool which has strong positive correlations with other well established self-report pain intensity measures. It has been recommended for measuring pain intensity in school-aged children (4 years and older). The objective of this study is to compare the concordance and the preference for two versions, electronic and paper, of the FPS-R, and to determine whether an electronic version of the FPS-R can be used by children aged 4 and older. Methods: The study is an observational, multicenter, randomized, cross-over, controlled, open trial. Medical and surgical patients in two pediatric hospitals (N = 202, age 4-12 years, mean age 8.3 years, 58% male) provided self-reports of their present pain using the FPS-R on a personal digital assistant (PDA) and on a paper version. Paper and electronic versions of the FPS-R were administered by a nurse in a randomized order: half the patients were given the PDA version first and the other half the paper version first. The time between the administrations was planned to be less than 30 minutes but not simultaneous. Two hundred and thirty-seven patients were enrolled; 35 were excluded from analysis because of misunderstanding of instructions or abnormal time between the two assessments. Results: Final population for analysis comprised 202 children. The overall weighted Kappa was 0.846 (95% CI: 0.795; 0.896) and the Spearman correlation between scores on the two versions was r(s) = 0.911 (p < 0.0001). The mean difference of pain scores was less than 0.1 out of 10, which was neither statistically nor clinically significant; 83.2% of children chose the same face on both versions of the FPS-R. Preference was not modified by order, sex, age, hospitalization unit (medical or surgical units), or previous analgesics. The PDA was preferred by 87.4% of the children who expressed a preference. Conclusion: The electronic version of the FPS-R can be recommended for use with children aged 4 to 12, either in clinical trials or in hospitals to monitor pain intensity.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Champion GD, 1998, PROG PAIN RES MANAG, V10, P123
[2]   Despite technical problems personal digital assistants outperform pen and paper when collecting patient diary data [J].
Dale, Oystein ;
Hagen, Kaare Birger .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 60 (01) :8-17
[3]  
Falinower S, 2004, DOULEURS, V5, P249
[4]   Development of a new computer method to assess children's pain [J].
Fanciullo, Gilbert J. ;
Cravero, Joseph P. ;
Mudge, Bridget O. ;
McHugo, Gregory J. ;
Baird, John C. .
PAIN MEDICINE, 2007, 8 :S121-S128
[5]   Computer Face Scale for Measuring Pediatric Pain and Mood [J].
Gulur, Padma ;
Rodi, Scott W. ;
Washington, Tabitha A. ;
Cravero, Joseph P. ;
Fanciullo, Gilbert J. ;
McHugo, Gregory J. ;
Baird, John C. .
JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2009, 10 (02) :173-179
[6]   The Faces Pain Scale - Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement [J].
Hicks, CL ;
von Baeyer, CL ;
Spafford, PA ;
van Korlaar, I ;
Goodenough, B .
PAIN, 2001, 93 (02) :173-183
[7]   Paper versus electronic rating scales for pain assessment:: a prospective, randomised, cross-over validation study with 200 chronic pain patients [J].
Junker, Uwe ;
Freynhagen, Rainer ;
Laengler, Klaus ;
Gockel, Ulrich ;
Schmidt, Uwe ;
Toelle, Thomas R. ;
Baron, Ralf ;
Kohlmann, Thomas .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2008, 24 (06) :1797-1806
[8]   e-Health and chronic pain management: Current status and developments [J].
Keogh, Edmund ;
Rosser, Benjamin A. ;
Eccleston, Christopher .
PAIN, 2010, 151 (01) :18-21
[9]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174
[10]  
Lane Shannon J, 2006, BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, V6, P23, DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-6-23