In Vitro Evaluation of Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Restorative Materials Submitted to Erosive Challenges

被引:47
作者
Briso, A. L. F. [1 ]
Caruzo, L. P. [1 ]
Guedes, A. P. A. [1 ]
Catelan, A. [2 ]
dos Santos, P. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
GASTROESOPHAGEAL-REFLUX; PENETRATING SEALANT; RESIN COMPOSITES; DENTAL EROSION; ENAMEL; ABRASION; TEXTURE; MEDIA; VIVO;
D O I
10.2341/10-356-L
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different acidic solutions on the microhardness and surface roughness of restorative materials. The 120 specimens of restorative materials (Fuji II LC, Vitremer, Supreme XT, and Supreme XT + Biscover LV) were randomly divided into three groups according to the immersion media: hydrochloric acid, soft drink, or distilled water. Over a period of five weeks, the groups were immersed in the solutions, which were changed weekly. Data were tested using analysis of variance and the Fisher protected least significant difference test (p < 0.05). The results showed that the glass ionomer materials showed the highest surface roughness values (Fuji II LC: 0.111 +/- 0.014 mu m before and 0.139 +/- 0.016 mu m after immersion; Vitremer: 0.177 +/- 0.012 mu m before and 0.084 +/- 0.012 mu m after immersion), whereas the lowest values were found for the resin sealed with Biscover LV before (0.047 +/- 0.011 mu m) and after exposure in distilled water (0.043 +/- 0.007 mu m), soft drink (0.040 +/- 0.005 mu m), and hydrochloric acid (0.045 +/- 0.005 mu m). The Supreme XT showed the highest microhardness values before (44.96 +/- 2.51 KHN) and after the aging process (41.26 +/- 1.22 KHN in water, 35.96 +/- 0.81 KHN in soft drink, and 34.74 +/- 0.97 KHN in HCl), with significant differences from the other materials (p < 0.0001). The lowest microhardness values were found for glass ionomer materials. The solutions used in this study decreased the microhardness of all studied materials, whereas the sealed surface suffered minor changes in microhardness and surface roughness after exposure to acidic solutions.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 402
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   The erosive potential of some alcopops using bovine enamel: An in vitro study [J].
Ablal, M. A. ;
Kaur, J. S. ;
Cooper, L. ;
Jarad, F. D. ;
Milosevic, A. ;
Higham, S. M. ;
Preston, A. J. .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2009, 37 (11) :835-839
[2]   Changes in the mechanical properties and surface texture of compomer immersed in various media [J].
Abu-bakr, N ;
Han, LL ;
Okamoto, A ;
Iwaku, M .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2000, 84 (04) :444-452
[3]  
Attar Nuray, 2007, J Contemp Dent Pract, V8, P27
[4]   In situ evaluation of different remineralization periods to decrease brushing abrasion of demineralized enamel [J].
Attin, T ;
Knöfel, S ;
Buchalla, W ;
Tütüncü, R .
CARIES RESEARCH, 2001, 35 (03) :216-222
[5]   The surface effects of erosion and abrasion on dentine with and without a protective layer [J].
Azzopardi, A ;
Bartlett, DW ;
Watson, TF ;
Sherriff, M .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2004, 196 (06) :351-354
[6]  
Badra VV, 2005, OPER DENT, V30, P213
[7]   A study of the association between gastro-oesophageal reflux and palatal dental erosion [J].
Bartlett, DW ;
Evans, DF ;
Anggiansah, A ;
Smith, BGN .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1996, 181 (04) :125-131
[8]   UPDATE ON DENTAL COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS [J].
BAYNE, SC ;
HEYMANN, HO ;
SWIFT, EJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 125 (06) :687-701
[9]  
Bertrand MF, 2000, J BIOMED MATER RES, V53, P658, DOI 10.1002/1097-4636(2000)53:6<658::AID-JBM7>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-O