Forty-Year Review of the Hoek-Brown Failure Criterion for Jointed Rock Masses

被引:44
作者
Renani, Hossein Rafiei [1 ]
Cai, Ming [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Klohn Crippen Berger Ltd, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Laurentian Univ, Geomech Res Ctr, MIRARCO, Sudbury, ON, Canada
[3] Laurentian Univ, Bharti Sch Engn, Sudbury, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Strength degradation relation; Geological strength index; Equivalent Coulomb criterion; Deformation modulus; Range of applicability; Uncertainty and sensitivity; GEOLOGICAL STRENGTH INDEX; CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL COLLOQUIUM; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; ENGINEERING PROPERTIES; DEFORMATION MODULUS; BRITTLE FAILURE; INTACT ROCK; STRESS; SIZE; GSI;
D O I
10.1007/s00603-021-02661-2
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The Hoek-Brown failure criterion has developed into the most widely used system for estimating rock mass strength in rock engineering. The reason lies in its unique framework for integrating the strength properties of intact rock and geological observations in the field. While the determination of intact rock properties from laboratory tests is relatively straightforward, quantifying the relevant geological characteristics remains challenging. Strength degradation relations play a central role in the Hoek-Brown failure criterion by downgrading the strength properties of intact rock, based on quantitative measures of rock mass quality and disturbance, to estimate the strength properties of the rock mass. In this independent review, the origin and evolution of the Hoek-Brown failure criterion and the associated strength degradation relations and rock mass characterization methods are discussed. Common methods for estimating rock mass cohesion, friction angle and deformation modulus are presented. The effect of parameter uncertainty on the reliability of estimated rock mass properties is investigated. Understanding the basis and development of the Hoek-Brown failure criterion is essential for proper use of the system within its limits of applicability and with realistic expectations of reliability.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 461
页数:23
相关论文
共 113 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1985, Australian Geomechanics
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, ROCK MECH POWER PLAN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1970, INT SOC ROCK MECH
[4]  
Aydan O., 1998, Proceedings of the regional symposium on sedimentary rock engineering, P228
[5]   SIZE EFFECT IN ROCK TESTING [J].
BAECHER, GB ;
EINSTEIN, HH .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1981, 8 (07) :671-674
[6]  
BALMER G, 1952, P AM SOC TEST MATER, V52, P1260
[7]  
Barton N., 1974, ROCK MECH, V6, P189, DOI [10.1007/bf01239496, DOI 10.1007/BF01239496, 10.1007/BF01239496]
[8]   A quantitative comparison of six rock failure criteria [J].
Benz, Thomas ;
Schwab, Radu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2008, 45 (07) :1176-1186
[9]   A Hoek-Brown criterion with intrinsic material strength factorization [J].
Benz, Thomas ;
Schwab, Radu ;
Kauther, Regina A. ;
Vermeer, Pieter A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2008, 45 (02) :210-222
[10]   Strength of massive to moderately jointed hard rock masses [J].
Bewick, R. P. ;
Kaiser, P. K. ;
Amann, E. .
JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 11 (03) :562-575