Social influence and interaction bias can drive emergent behavioural specialization and modular social networks across systems

被引:12
作者
Tokita, Christopher K. [1 ]
Tarnita, Corina E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
self-organization; division of labour; social dynamics; group size; assortativity; homophily; DIVISION-OF-LABOR; COLONY SIZE; PERSONALITIES; DYNAMICS; MODELS; CONNECTIVITY; POLARIZATION; ORGANIZATION; INHIBITION; ASSORTMENT;
D O I
10.1098/rsif.2019.0564
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In social systems ranging from ant colonies to human society, behavioural specialization-consistent individual differences in behaviour-is commonplace: individuals can specialize in the tasks they perform (division of labour (DOL)), the political behaviour they exhibit (political polarization) or the non-task behaviours they exhibit (personalities). Across these contexts, behavioural specialization often co-occurs with modular and assortative social networks, such that individuals tend to associate with others that have the same behavioural specialization. This raises the question of whether a common mechanism could drive co-emergent behavioural specialization and social network structure across contexts. To investigate this question, here we extend a model of self-organized DOL to account for social influence and interaction bias among individuals-social dynamics that have been shown to drive political polarization. We find that these same social dynamics can also drive emergent DOL by forming a feedback loop that reinforces behavioural differences between individuals, a feedback loop that is impacted by group size. Moreover, this feedback loop also results in modular and assortative social network structure, whereby individuals associate strongly with those performing the same task. Our findings suggest that DOL and political polarization-two social phenomena not typically considered together-may actually share a common social mechanism. This mechanism may result in social organization in many contexts beyond task performance and political behaviour.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 78 条
[41]   Fitness costs of worker specialization for ant societies [J].
Jongepier, Evelien ;
Foitzik, Susanne .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 283 (1822)
[42]   Personality in the context of social networks [J].
Krause, J. ;
James, R. ;
Croft, D. P. .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 365 (1560) :4099-4106
[43]  
Laskowski Kate L., 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences Series B, V281, P20133166, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2013.3166
[44]   Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences [J].
Layman, Geoffrey C. ;
Carsey, Thomas M. ;
Horowitz, Juliana Menasce .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 9 :83-110
[45]   The rise of the social algorithm [J].
Lazer, David .
SCIENCE, 2015, 348 (6239) :1090-1091
[46]   Social learning in insects - From miniature brains to consensus building [J].
Leadbeater, Ellouise ;
Chittka, Lars .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (16) :R703-R713
[47]   Individualization as Driving Force of Clustering Phenomena in Humans [J].
Maes, Michael ;
Flache, Andreas ;
Helbing, Dirk .
PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2010, 6 (10)
[48]   Chimps of a feather sit together: chimpanzee friendships are based on homophily in personality [J].
Massen, Jorg J. M. ;
Koski, Sonja E. .
EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2014, 35 (01) :1-8
[49]   Predicting fate from early connectivity in a social network [J].
McDonald, David B. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2007, 104 (26) :10910-10914
[50]   Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks [J].
McPherson, M ;
Smith-Lovin, L ;
Cook, JM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2001, 27 :415-444