Social influence and interaction bias can drive emergent behavioural specialization and modular social networks across systems

被引:12
作者
Tokita, Christopher K. [1 ]
Tarnita, Corina E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
self-organization; division of labour; social dynamics; group size; assortativity; homophily; DIVISION-OF-LABOR; COLONY SIZE; PERSONALITIES; DYNAMICS; MODELS; CONNECTIVITY; POLARIZATION; ORGANIZATION; INHIBITION; ASSORTMENT;
D O I
10.1098/rsif.2019.0564
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In social systems ranging from ant colonies to human society, behavioural specialization-consistent individual differences in behaviour-is commonplace: individuals can specialize in the tasks they perform (division of labour (DOL)), the political behaviour they exhibit (political polarization) or the non-task behaviours they exhibit (personalities). Across these contexts, behavioural specialization often co-occurs with modular and assortative social networks, such that individuals tend to associate with others that have the same behavioural specialization. This raises the question of whether a common mechanism could drive co-emergent behavioural specialization and social network structure across contexts. To investigate this question, here we extend a model of self-organized DOL to account for social influence and interaction bias among individuals-social dynamics that have been shown to drive political polarization. We find that these same social dynamics can also drive emergent DOL by forming a feedback loop that reinforces behavioural differences between individuals, a feedback loop that is impacted by group size. Moreover, this feedback loop also results in modular and assortative social network structure, whereby individuals associate strongly with those performing the same task. Our findings suggest that DOL and political polarization-two social phenomena not typically considered together-may actually share a common social mechanism. This mechanism may result in social organization in many contexts beyond task performance and political behaviour.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1887, INQUIRY NATURE CAUSE
[2]   Individual personalities predict social behaviour in wild networks of great tits (Parus major) [J].
Aplin, L. M. ;
Farine, D. R. ;
Morand-Ferron, J. ;
Cole, E. F. ;
Cockburn, A. ;
Sheldon, B. C. .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2013, 16 (11) :1365-1372
[3]   Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook [J].
Bakshy, Eytan ;
Messing, Solomon ;
Adamic, Lada A. .
SCIENCE, 2015, 348 (6239) :1130-1132
[4]   Dynamics of political polarization [J].
Baldassarri, Delia ;
Bearman, Peter .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2007, 72 (05) :784-811
[5]   Models of division of labor in social insects [J].
Beshers, SN ;
Fewell, JH .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY, 2001, 46 :413-440
[6]   Social inhibition and the regulation of temporal polyethism in honey bees [J].
Beshers, SN ;
Huang, ZY ;
Oono, Y ;
Robinson, GE .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2001, 213 (03) :461-479
[7]   Tool use and social homophily among male bottlenose dolphins [J].
Bizzozzero, M. R. ;
Allen, S. J. ;
Gerber, L. ;
Wild, S. ;
King, S. L. ;
Connor, R. C. ;
Friedman, W. R. ;
Wittwer, S. ;
Krutzen, M. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 286 (1904)
[8]   Time-Ordered Networks Reveal Limitations to Information Flow in Ant Colonies [J].
Blonder, Benjamin ;
Dornhaus, Anna .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (05)
[9]   Quantitative study of the fixed threshold model for the regulation of division of labour in insect societies [J].
Bonabeau, E ;
Theraulaz, G ;
Deneubourg, JL .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1996, 263 (1376) :1565-1569
[10]  
Bonner JT., 1988, EVOLUTION COMPLEXITY