Family structure and multiple domains of child well-being in the United States: a cross-sectional study

被引:39
|
作者
Krueger, Patrick M. [1 ]
Jutte, Douglas P. [2 ]
Franzini, Luisa [3 ]
Elo, Irma [4 ]
Hayward, Mark D.
机构
[1] Dept Hlth & Behav Sci, Denver, CO 80217 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Publ Hlth, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Sch Publ Hlth, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Dept Sociol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
POPULATION HEALTH METRICS | 2015年 / 13卷
关键词
Children; Family; Extended family; Access to health care; Utilization of health care; Health; School; Single parent; Grandparent; HEALTH; GRANDPARENTS; CORESIDENCE; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s12963-015-0038-0
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: We examine the association between family structure and children's health care utilization, barriers to health care access, health, and schooling and cognitive outcomes and assess whether socioeconomic status (SES) accounts for those family structure differences. We advance prior research by focusing on understudied but increasingly common family structures including single father families and five different family structures that include grandparents. Methods: Our data on United States children aged birth through 17 (unweighted N = 198,864) come from the 1997-2013 waves of the National Health Interview Survey, a nationally representative, publicly available, household-based sample. We examine 17 outcomes across nine family structures, including married couple, cohabiting couple, single mother, and single father families, with and without grandparents, and skipped-generation families that include children and grandparents but not parents. The SES measures include family income, home ownership, and parents' or grandparents' (depending on who is in the household) employment and education. Results: Compared to children living with married couples, children in single mother, extended single mother, and cohabiting couple families average poorer outcomes, but children in single father families sometimes average better health outcomes. The presence of grandparents in single parent, cohabiting, or married couple families does not buffer children from adverse outcomes. SES only partially explains family structure disparities in children's well-being. Conclusions: All non-married couple family structures are associated with some adverse outcomes among children, but the degree of disadvantage varies across family structures. Efforts to understand and improve child well-being might be most effective if they recognize the increasing diversity in children's living arrangements.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Family structure and multiple domains of child well-being in the United States: a cross-sectional study
    Patrick M Krueger
    Douglas P Jutte
    Luisa Franzini
    Irma Elo
    Mark D Hayward
    Population Health Metrics, 13
  • [2] The impact of bladder problems on well-being in multiple sclerosis - A cross-sectional study
    Islamoska, Sabrina
    Forman, Christian Riis
    Panicker, Jalesh N.
    Flachenecker, Peter
    Phe, Veronique
    Brichetto, Giampaolo
    Blok, Bertil
    Barken, Kim Bundvig
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2024, 87
  • [3] Interconception care during well-child visits by family physicians in the United States: A cross-sectional study
    Kuroda, Kaku
    Morley, Christopher P.
    Bailey, R. Eugene
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL AND FAMILY MEDICINE, 2024, 25 (01): : 28 - 35
  • [4] Associations between domains of sedentary behavior, well-being, and quality of life - a cross-sectional study
    Teno, Sabrina C.
    Silva, Marlene N.
    Judice, Pedro B.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [5] Well-Being at Work: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Portuguese Nutritionists
    Akutsu, Rita de Cassia
    Rocha, Ada
    Viana, Victor
    Akutsu, Luiz
    Silva, Izabel Cristina
    Assuncao Botelho, Raquel Braz
    Han, Heesup
    Raposo, Antonio
    Ariza-Montes, Antonio
    Araya-Castillo, Luis
    Zandonadi, Renata Puppin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (15)
  • [6] Identifying characteristics of high-poverty counties in the United States with high well-being: an observational cross-sectional study
    Arora, Anita
    Spatz, Erica S.
    Herrin, Jeph
    Riley, Carley
    Roy, Brita
    Rula, Elizabeth Y.
    Kell, Kenneth Patton
    Krumholz, Harlan M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (09):
  • [7] Gender, work, and family well-being in the United States
    Smock, PJ
    Noonan, M
    Work, Family, Health, and Well-Being, 2005, : 343 - 360
  • [8] Cross-sectional study of the perceived well-being of children in palliative care
    Toro-Perez, Daniel
    Camprodon-Rosanas, Ester
    Bolance, Catalina
    Guillen, Montserrat
    Vilarrubi, Sergi Navarro
    Limonero, Joaquin T.
    ANALES DE PEDIATRIA, 2025, 102 (01):
  • [9] WELL-BEING AND SATISFACTION OF NURSES IN SLOVENIAN HOSPITALS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
    Lorber, Mateja
    Treven, Sonja
    Mumel, Damijan
    ZDRAVSTVENO VARSTVO, 2020, 59 (03): : 180 - 188
  • [10] Physicians' Perspectives, Well-being, and Fulfilment in Telemedicine: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Gutu, Cristina Sicorschi
    Schmitz-Grosz, Krisztina
    Sommer-Meyer, Carsten
    Niklewski, Guenter
    TELEMEDICINE REPORTS, 2024, 5 (01): : 105 - 113