UN HUMAN RIGHTS TREATY MONITORING BODIES BEFORE DOMESTIC COURTS

被引：23

作者：

Kanetake, Machiko ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Utrecht, Publ Int Law, Utrecht, Netherlands

来源：

INTERNATIONAL & COMPARATIVE LAW QUARTERLY | 2018年 / 67卷 / 01期

关键词：

bindingness; domestic courts; Human Rights Committee; persuasiveness; UN human rights treaty monitoring bodies;

D O I：

10.1017/S002058931700046X

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

This article analyses both cooperative and confrontational interactions between domestic judges and UN human rights treaty monitoring bodies. Based on a number of cases collected through multiple databases, this article addresses the basis on which the monitoring bodies encourage the domestic acceptance of their views, general comments, and reports; how domestic courts engage with these findings; on what basis; and why some courts are more willing to engage with these findings. A key argument is that judicial accommodation is highly selective; domestic judges occasionally avoid, discount, and contest the interpretation put forward by the treaty monitoring bodies and thereby pose a challenge to their legitimacy.

引用

页码：201 / 232

页数：32