EXAMINING THE GENETIC UNDERPINNINGS TO MOFFITT'S DEVELOPMENTAL TAXONOMY: A BEHAVIORAL GENETIC ANALYSIS*

被引:74
作者
Barnes, J. C. [1 ]
Beaver, Kevin M. [2 ]
Boutwell, Brian B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Dallas, Sch Econ Polit & Policy Sci, Criminol Program, Richardson, TX 75080 USA
[2] Florida State Univ, Coll Criminol & Criminal Justice, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[3] Sam Houston State Univ, Coll Criminal Justice, Houston, TX USA
关键词
Moffitt taxonomy; offending patterns; behavioral genetics; DUTCH CONVICTION COHORT; PREDICTING EARLY-ONSET; ANTISOCIAL-BEHAVIOR; ENVIRONMENTAL-INFLUENCES; PERSONALITY-DEVELOPMENT; CONDUCT PROBLEMS; BIRTH-WEIGHT; SELF-CONTROL; ADOLESCENCE; HERITABILITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00243.x
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
In recent years, criminological research has observed an increase in studies examining different offending trajectories. Much of this research has been guided by Moffitt's (1993) developmental taxonomy of life-course persistent offenders, adolescence-limited offenders, and abstainers. Moffitt (1993) argued that the etiologies of these different pathways could be traced to several biosocial factors, including perhaps genetic factors. To date, research has failed to address this possibility directly. The current study addressed this gap in the literature by examining the extent to which genetic factors explain variance in different offending patterns. Analysis of sibling pairs (N = 2,284; ages spanned between 11 and 27 years) drawn from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) revealed that genetic factors contributed significantly to being classified in each of the different offending patterns. Specifically, genetic factors explained between 56 and 70 percent of the variance in being classified as a life-course persistent offender across different coding strategies, 35 percent of the variance in being classified as an adolescence-limited offender, and 56 percent of the variance in being classified as an abstainer. We discuss the importance of integrating genetics into future studies examining offending trajectories.
引用
收藏
页码:923 / 954
页数:32
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]   An integrated theory of the adolescent peak in offending [J].
Agnew, R .
YOUTH & SOCIETY, 2003, 34 (03) :263-299
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, NO 2 ALIKE HUMAN NAT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, GENES BEHAV
[4]   Strong genetic effects on cross-situational antisocial behaviour among 5-year-old children according to mothers, teachers, examiner-observers, and twins' self-reports [J].
Arseneault, L ;
Moffitt, TE ;
Caspi, A ;
Taylor, A ;
Rijsdijk, FV ;
Jaffee, SR ;
Ablow, JC ;
Measelle, JR .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 44 (06) :832-848
[5]   An empirical examination of adolescence-limited offending: A direct test of Moffitt's maturity gap thesis [J].
Barnes, J. C. ;
Beaver, Kevin M. .
JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2010, 38 (06) :1176-1185
[6]   Nonshared environmental influences on adolescent delinquent involvement and adult criminal behavior [J].
Beaver, Kevin M. .
CRIMINOLOGY, 2008, 46 (02) :341-369
[7]   The Intersection of Genes and Neuropsychological Deficits in the Prediction of Adolescent Delinquency and Low Self-Control [J].
Beaver, Kevin M. ;
DeLisi, Matt ;
Vaughn, Michael G. ;
Wright, John Paul .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2010, 54 (01) :22-42
[8]   GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES ON LEVELS OF SELF-CONTROL AND DELINQUENT PEER AFFILIATION [J].
Beaver, Kevin M. ;
Shutt, J. Eagle ;
Boutwell, Brian B. ;
Ratchford, Marie ;
Roberts, Kathleen ;
Barnes, J. C. .
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2009, 36 (01) :41-60
[9]  
BEAVER KM, 2005, YOUTH VIOLENCE JUV J, V0003
[10]   Cumulative-genetic plasticity, parenting and adolescent self-regulation [J].
Belsky, Jay ;
Beaver, Kevin M. .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 52 (05) :619-626