The impact of prostate size in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

被引:58
作者
Chang, CM [1 ]
Moon, D [1 ]
Gianduzzo, TR [1 ]
Eden, CG [1 ]
机构
[1] N Hampshire Hosp, Dept Urol, Basingstoke RG24 9NA, Hants, England
关键词
prostate cancer; prostatectomy; laparoscopic surgery;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.029
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: Large prostates can be challenging to remove during open or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Our objective was to critically analyse the impact of prostate volume in LRP. Methods: 400 cases of LRP were performed. Three hundred and fourteen patients had a small prostate (weight < 75 g) and 86 patients had a large prostate (weight >= 75 g) on final histology. The following outcomes were assessed: operative time; estimated blood loss (EBL); transfusion rate; length of hospital stay (LOS); length of catheterisation; perioperative and postoperative complications (including incontinence and erectile dysfunction); surgical margin status; and early biochemical recurrence rates. Results: Patients' age, PSA, Gleason sum and clinical stage were all similar. Larger prostates were associated with a 14 minutes longer mean operating time (p < 0.001), but fewer positive surgical margins (p = 0.01). Blood loss, blood transfusion rate, length of hospital stay, length of catheterisation and complication rate were all similar in both groups. Conclusions: Prostate size should not be a factor determining a patient's suitability for LRP. Further follow-up is needed to assess the effect of prostate size on long-term functional and oncological results. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 290
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, J UROLOGY
[2]   Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies [J].
Catalona, WJ ;
Carvalhal, GF ;
Mager, DE ;
Smith, DS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (02) :433-438
[3]   Predicting blood loss and transfusion requirements during radical prostatectomy: The significant negative impact of increasing body mass index [J].
Chang, SS ;
Duong, DT ;
Wells, N ;
Cole, EE ;
Smith, JA ;
Cookson, MS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (05) :1861-1865
[4]   A prostate gland volume of more than 75 cm3 predicts for a favorable outcome after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Schultz, D ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Wein, A .
UROLOGY, 1998, 52 (04) :631-636
[5]   Prospective assessment of incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: Objective and subjective analysis [J].
Donnellan, SM ;
Duncan, HJ ;
MacGregor, RJ ;
Russell, JM .
UROLOGY, 1997, 49 (02) :225-230
[6]   Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy [J].
Eastham, JA ;
Kattan, MW ;
Rogers, E ;
Goad, JR ;
Ohori, M ;
Boone, TB ;
Scardino, PT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 156 (05) :1707-1713
[7]   Transperitoneal or extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Does the approach matter? [J].
Eden, CG ;
King, D ;
Kooiman, GG ;
Adams, TH ;
Sullivan, ME ;
Vass, JA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (06) :2218-2223
[8]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - An analysis of factors affecting operating time [J].
El-Feel, A ;
Davis, JW ;
Deger, S ;
Roigas, J ;
Wille, AH ;
Schnorr, D ;
Loening, S ;
Hakiem, AA ;
Tuerk, IA .
UROLOGY, 2003, 62 (02) :314-318
[9]   Today men with prostate cancer have larger prostates [J].
Feneley, MR ;
Landis, P ;
Simon, I ;
Metter, EJ ;
Morrell, CH ;
Carter, HB ;
Walsh, PC .
UROLOGY, 2000, 56 (05) :839-842
[10]   A large prostate at radical retropubic prostatectomy does not adversely affect cancer control, continence or potency rates [J].
Foley, CL ;
Bott, SRJ ;
Thomas, K ;
Parkinson, MC ;
Kirby, RS .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 92 (04) :370-374