Epidemiological and economic impact of COVID-19 in the US

被引:45
作者
Chen, Jiangzhuo [1 ]
Vullikanti, Anil [1 ,2 ]
Santos, Joost [3 ]
Venkatramanan, Srinivasan [1 ]
Hoops, Stefan [1 ]
Mortveit, Henning [1 ,4 ]
Lewis, Bryan [1 ]
You, Wen [5 ]
Eubank, Stephen [1 ,5 ]
Marathe, Madhav [1 ,2 ]
Barrett, Chris [1 ,2 ]
Marathe, Achla [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Biocomplex Inst, Network Syst Sci & Adv Comp Div, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Dept Comp Sci, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[3] George Washington Univ, Dept Engn Management & Syst Engn, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[4] Univ Virginia, Dept Engn Syst & Environm, Charlottesville, VA USA
[5] Univ Virginia, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Charlottesville, VA 22901 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
INPUT-OUTPUT-ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-021-99712-z
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This research measures the epidemiological and economic impact of COVID-19 spread in the US under different mitigation scenarios, comprising of non-pharmaceutical interventions. A detailed disease model of COVID-19 is combined with a model of the US economy to estimate the direct impact of labor supply shock to each sector arising from morbidity, mortality, and lockdown, as well as the indirect impact caused by the interdependencies between sectors. During a lockdown, estimates of jobs that are workable from home in each sector are used to modify the shock to labor supply. Results show trade-offs between economic losses, and lives saved and infections averted are non-linear in compliance to social distancing and the duration of the lockdown. Sectors that are worst hit are not the labor-intensive sectors such as the Agriculture sector and the Construction sector, but the ones with high valued jobs such as the Professional Services, even after the teleworkability of jobs is accounted for. Additionally, the findings show that a low compliance to interventions can be overcome by a longer shutdown period and vice versa to arrive at similar epidemiological impact but their net effect on economic loss depends on the interplay between the marginal gains from averting infections and deaths, versus the marginal loss from having healthy workers stay at home during the shutdown.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Acemoglu D., 2020, Optimal Targeted Lockdowns, DOI DOI 10.3386/W27102
  • [2] Adiga Aniruddha, 2020, medRxiv, DOI 10.1101/2020.02.20.20025882
  • [3] Alva-Manchego F, 2020, COMPUT LINGUIST, V46, P135, DOI [10.1162/coli_a_00370, 10.1162/COLI_a_00370]
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2008, POLICY REWORKING P
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2020, ED WEEK
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2020, The New York Times
  • [7] Barrett C., 2009, GENERATION ANAL LARG
  • [8] Barrett ChristopherL., 2008, An Interaction-Based Approach to Computational Epidemiology, P1590
  • [9] Barro R.J., 2020, The coronavirus and the great influenza pandemic: Lessons from the "spanish flu" for the coronavirus's potential effects on mortality and economic activity 0898-2937, DOI 10.3386/w26866
  • [10] Bick A., 2021, Work from home after the COVID-19 Outbreak, DOI 10.24149/wp2017r1