Land Use and Agriculture: Pitfalls and Precautions on the Road to Net Zero

被引:12
作者
Reay, Dave. S. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Geosci, Edinburgh, Scotland
来源
FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE | 2020年 / 2卷
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
afforestation; peatlands; soil carbon (C) sequestration; carbon sequestration; rural policy design; GREENHOUSE-GAS-MITIGATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; AMMONIA EMISSIONS; CO-BENEFITS; USE SECTOR; CARBON; POLICY; IMPACTS; STORAGE; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.3389/fclim.2020.00004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Land use is a crucial sector in delivering enhanced carbon sequestration globally. At the same time food production is a major source of global greenhouse gas emissions. As pressure mounts for all nations to increase their levels of ambition under the Paris Climate Agreement, so the pressure to radically reduce emissions from the agriculture sector and enhance carbon sequestration in the land use sector also ramps up. This trend is most clearly evident in the drive for "net zero" where unavoidable emissions, such as those from food production, are balanced by more sequestration via land use change. Here we examine some of the major risks, applicable safeguards, and potential pathways for agriculture and land use in realizing net zero. Using the UK as an example we highlight the importance of governance, finance, skills, research and technology, and society in this transition. We conclude that successful land use policy for net zero will require extremely demanding levels of integration and spatial resolution, and that the research community has a vital role to play in providing a robust evidence base for this. We also invoke the Cancun safeguards as a basis on which a more sustainable and just transition to net zero might be based. Finally, we warn of unintended distortions to policy and markets if the drive for net zero is too blinkered.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] The potential for implementation of Negative Emission Technologies in Scotland
    Alcalde, Juan
    Smith, Pete
    Haszeldine, R. Stuart
    Bond, Clare E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2018, 76 : 85 - 91
  • [2] Allan J., 2020, A net-zero emissions economic recovery from COVID-19
  • [3] Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment
    Amon, B
    Kryvoruchko, V
    Amon, T
    Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 112 (2-3) : 153 - 162
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, ALTERNATIVE PAYMENT
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2020, The Sixth Carbon Budget. Sector summary-aviation
  • [6] The feasibility of low CO2 concentration targets and the role of bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)
    Azar, Christian
    Lindgren, Kristian
    Obersteiner, Michael
    Riahi, Keywan
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    den Elzen, K. Michel G. J.
    Moellersten, Kenneth
    Larson, Eric D.
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2010, 100 (01) : 195 - 202
  • [7] Precision Agriculture Technologies Positively Contributing to GHG Emissions Mitigation, Farm Productivity and Economics
    Balafoutis, Athanasios
    Beck, Bert
    Fountas, Spyros
    Vangeyte, Jurgen
    van der Wal, Tamme
    Soto, Iria
    Gomez-Barbero, Manuel
    Barnes, Andrew
    Eory, Vera
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (08)
  • [8] How imperfect can land sparing be before land sharing is more favourable for wild species?
    Balmford, Ben
    Green, Rhys E.
    Onial, Malvika
    Phalan, Ben
    Balmford, Andrew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2019, 56 (01) : 73 - 84
  • [9] Public funding for public goods: A post-Brexit perspective on principles for agricultural policy
    Bateman, Ian J.
    Balmford, Ben
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 79 : 293 - 300
  • [10] Embodied Carbon Tariffs
    Boehringer, Christoph
    Carbone, Jared C.
    Rutherford, Thomas F.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2018, 120 (01) : 183 - 210