An environmental and economic analysis of emission reduction strategies for container ships with emphasis on the improved energy efficiency indexes

被引:34
作者
Ammar, Nader R. [1 ,2 ]
Seddiek, Ibrahim S. [3 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Maritime Studies, Dept Marine Engn, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
[2] Alexandria Univ, Dept Naval Architecture & Marine Engn, Fac Engn, Alexandria 21544, Egypt
[3] Arab Acad Sci Technol & Maritime Transport, Coll Maritime Transport & Technol, Dept Marine Engn Technol, Alexandria 1029, Egypt
关键词
Ship emission reduction; IMO regulations; Container ship; EEDI; EEOI; Ship efficiency; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; CO2; EMISSION; NATURAL-GAS; FUEL; IMPACT; SPEED; PREDICTION; SELECTION; BENEFITS; SOX;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-020-08861-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The international maritime organization (IMO) has introduced several legislations to optimize the use of energy generated from machinery onboard ships to reduce the emitted exhaust gas emissions. The aim of the current paper is to study the effect of using emission reduction strategies for container ships with emphasis on the improved Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) from environmental and economic points of view. As a case study, A19 and A7 class container ships are investigated. Three different options are considered including natural gas, treatment equipment, and ship speed reduction. The lowest annual emission rates per transported cargo are achieved by A19. These rates are 18.9, 0.93, and 1.8 kg/TEU for NOx, SOx, and CO2 emissions, respectively. In order to improve the EEDI value for the A7, the ship speed should be reduced by 22.5%. This will comply with the three phases of IMO requirements by reducing CO2 emissions with cost-effectiveness of 52.54 $/ton CO2. On the other hand, using the installed dual-fuel engine infrastructure onboard A19 container ship will improve the energy efficiency by 10.13% with annual fuel saving of 23.73 million dollars.
引用
收藏
页码:23342 / 23355
页数:14
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
*ABS, 2013, SHIP EN EFF MEAS STA, P20
[2]  
ALISAFAKI AG, 2015, P I MECH ENG M-J ENG, V231, P19
[3]   ENVIRONMENTAL AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS COMPARISON OF DUAL FUEL PROPULSION OPTIONS FOR EMISSIONS REDUCTION ONBOARD LNG CARRIERS [J].
Ammar, Nader R. .
BRODOGRADNJA, 2019, 70 (03) :61-77
[4]   An environmental and economic analysis of methanol fuel for a cellular container ship [J].
Ammar, Nader R. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 69 :66-76
[5]   Thermodynamic, environmental and economic analysis of absorption air conditioning unit for emissions reduction onboard passenger ships [J].
Ammar, Nader R. ;
Seddiek, Ibrahim S. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 62 :726-738
[6]   Energy- and cost-efficiency analysis of greenhouse gas emission reduction using slow steaming of ships: case study RO-RO cargo vessel [J].
Ammar, Nader R. .
SHIPS AND OFFSHORE STRUCTURES, 2018, 13 (08) :868-876
[7]   Eco-environmental analysis of ship emission control methods: Case study RO-RO cargo vessel [J].
Ammar, Nader R. ;
Seddiek, Ibrahim S. .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2017, 137 :166-173
[8]   Influence of the required EEDI reduction factor on the CO2 emission from bulk carriers [J].
Ancic, Ivica ;
Sestan, Ante .
ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 84 :107-116
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2009, MEPC.1/Circ.684
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2020, SHORT TERM ENERGY OU