Agency in meso-level language policy planning in the face of macro-level policy shifts: a case study of multilingual education in a Chinese tertiary institution

被引:13
作者
Chen, Xiuwen [1 ]
Tao, Jian [1 ]
Zhao, Ke [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Foreign Studies, 623 Red Tile Bldg,777 Guoding Rd, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
关键词
Agency; multilingual education; higher education; meso-level language policy planning; PROFESSIONAL AGENCY; INDIVIDUAL AGENCY; ENGLISH; UNIVERSITY; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1080/14664208.2020.1741234
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In contrast to the waning interest in learning languages other than English (LOTEs) worldwide, mainland China is pursuing to diversify LOTE education because of the 'Belt and Road Initiative.' In response to language policy shifts, individual stakeholders in local contexts such as universities have to take actions to initiate LOTE programs or courses. However, there is still a paucity of research through an in situ lens into meso-level language policy planning (LPP) and implementation. To address this research gap, this study aims to obtain an in-depth understanding of the agentive actions of two groups of individual stakeholders at institutional level: people with power, and people with expertise. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with seven individual actors, the findings reveal that first, although these individual actors demonstrated agency in responding to macro-level language policy changes, the agency that they actually exercised was relatively limited in terms of the diversification of LOTE education. Second, by examining contextual and personal features, we identified multiple factors that mediate individual actors' agency in implementing top-down language policy. These findings may help orient language policy makers to create supportive contexts for the exercise of individual agency at local context in LPP and implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 156
页数:21
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Language and agency [J].
Ahearn, LM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ANTHROPOLOGY, 2001, 30 :109-137
[2]  
Alam S, 2017, ACM-IEEE J CONF DIG, P237
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, INTRO LANGUAGE POLIC
[4]   Rearticulating the Case for Micro Language Planning in a Language Ecology Context [J].
Baldauf, Richard B., Jr. .
CURRENT ISSUES IN LANGUAGE PLANNING, 2006, 7 (2-3) :147-170
[5]   Language ideology or language practice? An analysis of language policy documents at Swedish universities [J].
Bjorkman, Beyza .
MULTILINGUA-JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL AND INTERLANGUAGE COMMUNICATION, 2014, 33 (3-4) :335-363
[6]  
CHEN X, CURRENT ISSUES LANGU
[7]   Language Learning as Investment or Consumption? A Case Study of Chinese University Students' Beliefs about the Learning of Languages Other than English [J].
Chen, Xiuwen ;
Zhao, Ke ;
Tao, Jian .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (06)
[8]   Individual agency and changing language education policy in China: reactions to the new 'Guidelines on College English Teaching' [J].
Cheng, Jingyan ;
Wei, Li .
CURRENT ISSUES IN LANGUAGE PLANNING, 2021, 22 (1-2) :117-135
[9]  
Cho J., 2017, English language ideologies in Korea: Interpreting the past and present
[10]  
Duff P., 2012, Handbook of second language acquisition, P410, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203808184