A Hybrid MCDM Method Using Combination Weight for the Selection of Facility Layout in the Manufacturing System: A Case Study

被引:25
作者
Zha, Shanshan [1 ]
Guo, Yu [1 ]
Huang, Shaohua [1 ]
Wang, Shengbo [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Mech & Elect Engn, Nanjing 210016, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; FUZZY DEMATEL; LOCATION SELECTION; DECISION-MAKING; AHP; MULTICRITERIA; PROMETHEE; TOPSIS; WASTE; VIKOR;
D O I
10.1155/2020/1320173
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Facility layout in the manufacturing system is an elaborate production activity since multiple, uncertain, and conflicting factors would affect facility layout decisions. Selecting the best facility layout among alternatives is considered as a problematic multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. Generally, the facility layout is evaluated by the MCDM method with redundant factors, separate weights, and independent relationships between factors. To overcome this defect, this paper intends to propose a hybrid fuzzy MCDM method with combination weight (CW) based on integration with Delphi, fuzzy ANP, Entropy, and fuzzy PROMETHEE (CW-DFAE-FP) to select the most suitable facility layout alternative in an aircraft assembly workshop. The application results indicate that this method can effectively obtain the most suitable alternative for facility layout selection. Furthermore, the comparative analysis with other MCDM methods verifies the effectiveness of the proposed method and reveals the selection of weight has an impact on final priority ranking. Finally, sensitivity analysis highlights the performance of the proposed method and provides strategic insights to identify the critical criteria for the best alternative in facility layout.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Suitable Mining Method Selection using HFGDM-TOPSIS Method: a Case Study of an Apatite Mine [J].
Pak, Myong Chun ;
Han, Un Chol ;
Kim, Dong Il .
JOURNAL OF MINING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 13 (02) :357-374
[32]   Site selection of ecotourism areas with GIS-Based MCDM-AHP method: A case study of Camlıhemsin District [J].
Koca, Cemile ;
Kaymaz, Caglar Kivanc .
GEOMATIK, 2024, 9 (02) :185-206
[33]   Supplier selection using a clustering method based on a new distance for interval type-2 fuzzy sets: A case study [J].
Heidarzade, Armaghan ;
Mandavi, Iraj ;
Mandavi-Amiri, Nezam .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2016, 38 :213-231
[34]   hybrid Model Using MCDM Methods and Bipolar Neutrosophic Sets for Select Optimal Wind Turbine: Case Study in Egypt [J].
Abdel-Monem A. ;
Gawad A.A. .
Abdel-Monem, Ahmed (ahmed.abdelmon3m15@gmail.com); Gawad, Amal Abdel (amgawad2001@yahoo.com), 1600, University of New Mexico (42) :1-27
[35]   Optimal selection and management of hybrid renewable energy System: Neom city as a case study [J].
Salameh, Tareq ;
Sayed, Enas Taha ;
Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali ;
Olabi, A. G. ;
Rezk, Hegazy .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 244
[36]   A modified failure modes and effects analysis using interval-valued spherical fuzzy extension of TOPSIS method: case study in a marble manufacturing facility [J].
Gul, Muhammet ;
Ak, M. Fatih .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 25 (08) :6157-6178
[37]   A modified failure modes and effects analysis using interval-valued spherical fuzzy extension of TOPSIS method: case study in a marble manufacturing facility [J].
Muhammet Gul ;
M. Fatih Ak .
Soft Computing, 2021, 25 :6157-6178
[38]   Selection of strategies to improve energy efficiency in industry: A hybrid approach using entropy weight method and fuzzy TOPSIS [J].
Banadkouki, Mohammad Reza Zare .
ENERGY, 2023, 279
[39]   Wind farm site selection using BWM-AHP-MARCOS method: A case study of Libya [J].
Badi, Ibrahim ;
Pamucar, Dragan ;
Stevi, Zeljko ;
Muhammad, L. J. .
SCIENTIFIC AFRICAN, 2023, 19
[40]   Developing a Hybrid Method of Analytical Hierarchy Process and Additive Ratio Assessment for Ranking Suppliers: A Case Study of an Indonesian Concrete Manufacturing Company [J].
Ristono, Agus ;
Wahyuningsih, Tri ;
Madyno Putro, Gunawan .
MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING REVIEW, 2024, 15 (04) :1-12