Forecasting technological progress potential based on the complexity of product knowledge

被引:8
作者
Dong, Andy [1 ]
Sarkar, Somwrita [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Engn & Informat Technol, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Architecture Design & Planning Wilkinson Bldg, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Emerging technology; Product architecture; Network; Modularity; Management of innovation; Technological forecasting; DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT; FUNCTIONAL BASIS; INNOVATION; DESIGN; MODULARITY; NETWORKS; INDUSTRIAL; MODEL; VIEW;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Investing in R&D for a product employing new technologies is a challenging issue for companies and governments alike, especially at the critical juncture of deciding the degree of resource allocation, if any. Decision-makers generally rely either on historical data or intuitive prediction to gauge the rate of improvement and level of R&D spending to achieve the desired improvement. This paper introduces a systematic way of forecasting the endogenous progress potential of a product based on the complexity of its knowledge structure. The knowledge structure represents knowledge associated with the product's core technology and the configuration of the components and sub-systems supporting the core technology. Topological properties of complex networks are applied to assess the knowledge complexity of a product relative to its class. Analyses of the complexity of knowledge structures for a set of energy harvesting devices confirm that node degree and clustering coefficient provide distinguishing topological properties whereas community size and membership number do not clearly differentiate the knowledge structure complexity. We discuss the implications of these findings on forecasting progress potential. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 610
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, PALEOANTHROPOLOGY, DOI DOI 10.4207/PA.2011.ART49
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Small Worlds. The Dynamics of Networks Between Order and Randomness
[3]  
ARGOTE L., 2005, Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge
[4]   Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge [J].
Argote, Linda ;
Miron-Spektor, Ella .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (05) :1123-1137
[5]   The Architecture of complexity [J].
Barabasi, Albert-Lashlo .
IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 2007, 27 (04) :33-42
[6]   NEW PRODUCT GROWTH FOR MODEL CONSUMER DURABLES [J].
BASS, FM .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE SERIES A-THEORY, 1969, 15 (05) :215-227
[7]   THE FIRM AS A COMMUNICATION-NETWORK [J].
BOLTON, P ;
DEWATRIPONT, M .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1994, 109 (04) :809-839
[8]   A Formalization of Functions as Operations on Flows [J].
Borgo, Stefano ;
Carrara, Massimiliano ;
Garbacz, Pawel ;
Vermaas, Pieter E. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING, 2011, 11 (03)
[9]   Topology of large-scale engineering problem-solving networks [J].
Braha, D ;
Bar-Yam, Y .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2004, 69 (01) :7
[10]   The statistical mechanics of complex product development: Empirical and analytical results [J].
Braha, Dan ;
Bar-Yam, Yaneer .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (07) :1127-1145