Multiscaling analysis of soil roughness variability

被引:23
作者
Garcia Moreno, R. [1 ]
Diaz Alvarez, M. C. [2 ]
Saa Requejo, A. [2 ]
Valencia Delfa, J. L. [3 ]
Tarquis, A. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ A Coruna, Fac Ciencias, Dept Ciencias Navegac & Terra, Zapateira 15001, A Coruna, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Madrid, Sch Agr Engn, CEIGRAM Ctr Studies & Res Agr & Environm Risk Man, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Complutense Madrid, Escuela Univ Estadist, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
关键词
Multiscaling analysis; Soil surface roughness; Structure function; Soil roughness variability; SURFACE-ROUGHNESS; FRACTAL DIMENSION; LASER SCANNER; TILLAGE; MICRORELIEF;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.04.011
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Soil surface roughness (SSR) is a parameter highly suited for the study of soil susceptibility to wind and water erosion. The development of a methodology for quantifying SSR has typically been based on field techniques to obtain data, rather than on the indexes used for interpreting soil roughness variability. One of the most used indexes to evaluate SSR is the random roughness (RR), easily calculated from the heights obtained with a pin meter. The RR index was obtained from soil elevation measurements collected at the intersections of a 2 x 2-cm(2) grid in a 100 x 400-cm(2) plot from three different types of soil. SSR values for all soil types were obtained after passing three different tillage tools (chisel, tiller, and roller) through three types of soils at field conditions. The RR index was calculated using the standard deviation (SD) of the lines parallel to the direction of tillage. Lines were 20 mm apart. Since RR assumes vertical random roughness without correlation, the variability of SSR was assessed using structure function (SF) to complement the study. Therefore, the main objective of this analysis was to better illustrate the variability of SSR in relation to spatial distribution. The SF was highly sensitive to soil roughness variability and depended on the tillage tool treatments and soil types, thereby illustrating the origin of the soil roughness variability, either from the soil itself or from the tillage tool used. We also demonstrate that the concept of a generalised Hurst exponent derived from the SF improves our ability to differentiate among the cases. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 30
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Allmaras R.R., 1966, 7 USDA CONS, V7, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1967, 37 ANN INT M
[3]   ON THE FRACTAL DIMENSIONS OF SOME TRANSIENT SOIL PROPERTIES [J].
ARMSTRONG, AC .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1986, 37 (04) :641-652
[4]  
BOIFFIN J., 1984, THESIS I NATL AGRONO
[5]  
BURWELL R. E., 1963, SOU SCI SOC AMER PROC, V27, P697
[6]  
Currence H.D., 1970, T ASAE, V13, P710
[7]  
Darboux F, 2003, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V67, P92, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2003.0092
[8]   MULTIFRACTAL CHARACTERIZATIONS OF NONSTATIONARITY AND INTERMITTENCY IN GEOPHYSICAL FIELDS - OBSERVED, RETRIEVED, OR SIMULATED [J].
DAVIS, A ;
MARSHAK, A ;
WISCOMBE, W ;
CAHALAN, R .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1994, 99 (D4) :8055-8072
[9]   Surface roughness changes as affected by rainfall erosivity, tillage, and canopy cover [J].
Eltz, FLF ;
Norton, LD .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1997, 61 (06) :1746-1755
[10]   ESTIMATING FRACTAL DIMENSION OF PROFILES - A COMPARISON OF METHODS [J].
GALLANT, JC ;
MOORE, ID ;
HUTCHINSON, MF ;
GESSLER, P .
MATHEMATICAL GEOLOGY, 1994, 26 (04) :455-481