Patient-reported experiences of consultation with an advanced nurse practitioner: Factor structure and reliability analysis of the patient enablement and satisfaction survey

被引:2
作者
O'Reilly, David [1 ]
Brady, Anne-Marie [2 ]
Bryant-Lukosius, Denise [3 ]
Varley, Jarlath [2 ]
Daly, Louise [2 ]
Cotter, Patrick [1 ]
Elliot, Naomi [2 ]
Lehane, Elaine [1 ]
Fleming, Sandra [2 ]
Savage, Eileen [1 ]
Hegarty, Josephine [1 ]
Drennan, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Cork, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Cork, Ireland
[2] Trinity Coll Dublin, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dublin, Ireland
[3] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
advanced nursing practice; factor analysis; nursing; patient enablement; patient experience; patient-reported experience measures; reliability; EXPLORATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; GENERAL-PRACTICE; SAMPLE-SIZE; INTERNAL STRUCTURE; CARE; FRAMEWORK; IMPACT; RECOMMENDATIONS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1111/jan.15026
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim The aim was to analyse the psychometric properties of a patient-reported-experience measure, the Patient Enablement and Satisfaction Survey (PESS), when used to evaluate the care provided by Advanced Nurse Practitioners (ANPs) in terms of factor structure and internal consistency. The PESS is a 20-item, patient-completed data collection tool that was originally developed to measure patient experience and enablement following consultation with nurses in general practice. Design Cross-sectional survey; validity and reliability analysis. Methods The sample in this study consisted of 178 patients who consulted with 26 ANPs working in four different specialities. Data were collected between June and December 2019. An exploratory factor analysis of the PESS was conducted to determine convergent validity which was supported by parallel analysis and the traditional Kaiser criterion. The internal consistency of individual PESS items was determined via Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, the Average Variance Extracted tests and item-subscale/total score correlations. Results A three-factor structure (PESS-ANP) was found through exploratory factor analysis and this was supported by parallel analysis, the traditional Kaiser criterion and the percentage of variance explained criterion. A high degree of internal consistency was reported across all factors. One question was omitted from the analysis ('Overall Satisfaction') following the identification of problematic cross-loadings. The three factor solution was identified as: patient satisfaction, quality of care provision and patient enablement. Conclusion The findings of this study propose a three-factor model that is sufficiently reliable for analysing the experience and enablement of patients following consultation with an ANP. Impact Increasingly, patient-reported experience measures are being used to evaluate patients' experience of receiving care from a healthcare professional. The PESS was identified to be reliable in evaluating the experience of patients who receive care from an ANP while a three-factor structure was proposed that can capture specific attributes of this care.
引用
收藏
页码:4279 / 4289
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
[11]  
Cole F L, 1999, J Am Acad Nurse Pract, V11, P471, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-7599.1999.tb01043.x
[12]  
CRONBACH LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF02310555, 10.1007/bf02310555]
[13]   Factor recovery by principal axis factoring and maximum likelihood factor analysis as a function of factor pattern and sample size [J].
de Winter, J. C. F. ;
Dodou, D. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2012, 39 (04) :695-710
[14]  
Department of Health, 2019, POL DEV GRAD ADV NUR
[15]  
Department of Health, 2017, DEV POL GRAD SP ADV
[16]   Developing a positive patient experience with nurses in general practice: An integrated model of patient satisfaction and enablement [J].
Desborough, Jane ;
Phillips, Christine ;
Mills, Jane ;
Korda, Rosemary ;
Bagheri, Nasser ;
Banfield, Michelle .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2018, 74 (03) :564-578
[17]   The impact of general practice nursing care on patient satisfaction and enablement in Australia: A mixed methods study [J].
Desborough, Jane ;
Bagheri, Nasser ;
Banfield, Michelle ;
Mills, Jane ;
Phillips, Christine ;
Korda, Rosemary .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2016, 64 :108-119
[18]   A tool to evaluate patients' experiences of nursing care in Australian general practice: development of the Patient Enablement and Satisfaction Survey [J].
Desborough, Jane ;
Banfield, Michelle ;
Parker, Rhian .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2014, 20 (02) :209-215
[19]   A Systematic Review of the Cost-Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners and Clinical Nurse Specialists: What Is the Quality of the Evidence? [J].
Donald, Faith ;
Kilpatrick, Kelley ;
Reid, Kim ;
Carter, Nancy ;
Martin-Misener, Ruth ;
Bryant-Lukosius, Denise ;
Harbman, Patricia ;
Kaasalainen, Sharon ;
Marshall, Deborah A. ;
Charbonneau-Smith, Renee ;
Donald, Erin E. ;
Lloyd, Monique ;
Wickson-Griffiths, Abigail ;
Yost, Jennifer ;
Baxter, Pamela ;
Sangster-Gormley, Esther ;
Hubley, Pamela ;
Laflamme, Celyne ;
Campbell-Yeo, Marsha ;
Price, Sheri ;
Boyko, Jennifer ;
DiCenso, Alba .
NURSING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2014, 2014
[20]   Patients' level of satisfaction and self-reports of intention to comply following consultation with nurses and midwives with prescriptive authority: A cross-sectional survey [J].
Drennan, Jonathan ;
Naughton, Corina ;
Allen, Deirdre ;
Hyde, Abbey ;
O'Boyle, Kathy ;
Felle, Patrick ;
Treacy, Margaret ;
Butler, Michelle .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2011, 48 (07) :808-817