Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life-sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context

被引:21
作者
Allard, Julie [1 ,2 ]
Fortin, Marie-Chantal [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, Ctr Rech, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Ecole Sante Publ, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Bioeth Program, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] CHUM, Nephrol & Transplantat Div, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
AMYOTROPHIC-LATERAL-SCLEROSIS; CARDIAC DEATH; CARDIOCIRCULATORY DEATH; SUICIDE; EUTHANASIA; PROCUREMENT; KIDNEY;
D O I
10.1136/medethics-2016-103460
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
In June 2016, following the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada to decriminalise assistance in dying, the Canadian government enacted Bill C-14, legalising medical assistance in dying (MAID). In 2014, the province of Quebec had passed end-of-life care legislation making MAID available as of December 2015. The availability of MAID has many implications, including the possibility of combining this practice with organ donation through the controlled donation after cardiac death (cDCD) protocol. cDCD most often occurs in cases where the patient has a severe neurological injury but does not meet all the criteria for brain death. The donation is subsequent to the decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment (LST). Cases where patients are conscious prior to the withdrawal of LST are unusual, and have raised doubts as to the acceptability of removing organs from individuals who are not neurologically impaired and who have voluntarily chosen to die. These cases can be compared with likely scenarios in which patients will request both MAID and organ donation. In both instances, patients will be conscious and competent. Organ donation in such contexts raises ethical issues regarding respect for autonomy, societal pressure, conscientious objections and the dead-donor rule. In this article, we look at relevant policies in other countries and examine the ethical issues associated with cDCD in conscious patients who choose to die.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 605
页数:5
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
American Society of Transplant Surgoens, 2015, ASTS STAT CONSC DCD
[2]  
[Anonymous], NAT PROT DON CARD DE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, RAPP MARS 2012
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, ORG PROC TRASNP NETW
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, UK GUID TRANSP DON D
[6]   The boundaries of organ donation after circulatory death [J].
Bernat, James L. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 359 (07) :669-671
[7]   Organ Donation After Euthanasia: A Dutch Practical Manual [J].
Bollen, J. ;
de Jongh, W. ;
Hagenaars, J. ;
van Dijk, G. ;
ten Hoopen, R. ;
Ysebaert, D. ;
Ijzermans, J. ;
van Heurn, E. ;
van Mook, W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 16 (07) :1967-1972
[8]   Legal and ethical aspects of organ donation after euthanasia in Belgium and the Netherlands [J].
Bollen, Jan ;
ten Hoopen, Rankie ;
Ysebaert, Dirk ;
van Mook, Walther ;
van Heurn, Ernst .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2016, 42 (08) :486-489
[9]   The cadaveric kidney and the organ shortage - a perspective review [J].
Brasile, L ;
Stubenitsky, B ;
Booster, M ;
Kootstra, G .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 15 (06) :369-374
[10]  
Canadian Institute of Health Information, 2016, TREATM END STAG ORG