Investment attractiveness of afforestation in Canada inclusive of carbon sequestration benefits

被引:45
作者
Yemshanov, D
McKenney, DW
Hatton, T
Fox, G
机构
[1] Great Lakes Forestry Ctr, Canadian Forestry Serv, Marie, ON P6A 2E5, Canada
[2] Natl Capital Reg, Canadian Forestry Serv, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE | 2005年 / 53卷 / 04期
关键词
FOREST; TREES; TIMBER; COSTS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.00021.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Afforestation is one of several possible mechanisins available to sequester carbon and hell) reduce greenhouse gas concentrations. We have developed a spatial Monte Carlo-based sinuulation model, Canadian Forest Service-Afforestation Feasibility Model (CFS-AFM) to help assess the financial attractiveness of afforemation as a means of carbon slot-age in Canada. The model tracks five carbon pools and simulates costs and benefits of plantation investments. In this paper we sinulate three,forestation scenarios that could be used in Canada; plantations using hybrid poplar, hardwoods, of and soft woods with average growth rates of 14 and 6-7 m(3)/year, respectively The attractiveness of afforestation is driven by regional cost and plantation productivity variation and carbon price expectations. The results indicate that afforestation would be (at attractive investment in many areas of the country at carbon prices of $10 per metric ton of CO2 or higher. However, with a zero carbon price, very little afforestation would be financially viable. Thus, with low carbon price expectations, other co-benefits may be required to make afforestation more attractive to Canadian investors.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 323
页数:17
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, WO58 USDA FOR SERV
[2]  
[Anonymous], SPECIAL PUBLICATION
[3]  
[Anonymous], PLANTING TREES CARBO
[4]   Estimating and valuing the carbon sequestered in softwood and hardwood trees, timber products and forest soils in Wales [J].
Bateman, IJ ;
Lovett, AA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2000, 60 (04) :301-323
[5]  
Boardman A.E., 2001, Cost-benefit analysis: concept and practice, V2d ed
[6]  
Bowes M.D., 1989, Multiple-use management
[7]  
BROWN S, 2001, CAN CARB SINKS BE OP
[8]   Carbon-accounting methods and reforestation incentives [J].
Cacho, OJ ;
Hean, RL ;
Wise, RM .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2003, 47 (02) :153-179
[9]  
CACHO OJ, 2002, INT S FOR CARB SEQ M, P77
[10]   Reinforcing economic incentives for carbon credits for forests [J].
Cairns, RD ;
Lasserre, P .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2004, 6 (3-4) :321-328