Cervical Spine Immobilization in Patients With a Geriatric Facial Structure: The Influence of a Geriatric Mandible Structure on the Immobilization Quality Using a Cervical Collar

被引:3
作者
Jung, Matthias K. [1 ]
Grutzner, Paul A. [1 ]
Schneider, Niko R. E. [2 ]
Keil, Holger [3 ]
Kreinest, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Clin Trauma & Orthopaed Surg, BG Trauma Ctr Ludwigshafen, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Clin Anesthesiol, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Clin Trauma & Orthopaed Surg, Erlangen, Germany
关键词
geriatric facial structure; cervical spine; cervical collar; immobilization quality; INTUBATION; MOTION; MANAGEMENT; MOVEMENT; NEED;
D O I
10.1177/21514593211021824
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Introduction: Demographic changes have resulted in an increase in injuries among geriatric patients. For these patients, a rigid cervical collar is crucial for immobilizing the cervical spine. However, evidence suggests that patients with a geriatric facial structure require a different means of immobilization than patients with an adult facial structure. This study aimed to analyze the remaining motion of the immobilized cervical spine based on facial structure. Materials and Methods: This study was performed on 8 fresh human cadavers. Facial structure was evaluated via ascertaining the mandibular angle by computer tomography. A mandibular angle below 130 degrees, belongs to the adult facial structure group (n = 4) and a mandibular angle above 130 degrees, belongs to the geriatric facial structure group (n = 4). The flexion and lateral bending of the immobilized cervical spine were analyzed in both groups using a wireless motion tracker system. Results: A flexion of up to 19.0 degrees was measured in the adult facial structure group. The mean flexion in the adult vs. geriatric facial structure groups were 14.5 degrees vs. 6.5 degrees (ranges: 9.0-19.0 vs. 5.0-7.0 degrees), respectively. Thus, cervical spine motion was (p = 0.0286) significantly more reduced in the adult facial structure group. No (p = 0.0571) significant difference was oberserved in the mean lateral bending of the adult facial structure group (14.5 degrees) compared to the geriatric facial structure group (7.5 degrees). Conclusion: Emergency medical service personnel should therefore follow current guidelines and recommendations and perform cervical spine immobilization with a cervical collar, including in patients with a geriatric facial structure.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Amemori H, 1966, Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ, V13, P203
[2]   Prehospital clearance of the cervical spine: does it need to be a pain in the neck? [J].
Armstrong, B. P. ;
Simpson, H. K. ;
Crouch, R. ;
Deakin, C. D. .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2007, 24 (07) :501-503
[3]   Assessing range of motion to evaluate the adverse effects of ill-fitting cervical orthoses [J].
Bell, Kevin M. ;
Frazier, Erik C. ;
Shively, Charise M. ;
Hartman, Robert A. ;
Ulibarri, James C. ;
Lee, Joon Y. ;
Kang, James D. ;
Donaldson, William F., III .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (03) :225-231
[4]   Why Do We Put Cervical Collars On Conscious Trauma Patients? [J].
Benger, Jonathan ;
Blackham, Julian .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 17
[5]  
Del Rossi Gianluca, 2004, Spine J, V4, P619
[6]  
Dunn Thomas M, 2004, Prehosp Emerg Care, V8, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.prehos.2003.12.018
[7]   Revolutionary advances in enhancing patient comfort on patients transported on a backboard [J].
Edlich, Richard F. ;
Masonb, Shelley S. ;
Vissers, Rober J. ;
Gubler, K. Dean ;
Thacker, John G. ;
Pharr, Paul ;
Anderson, Mark ;
Long, William B., III .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 29 (02) :181-186
[8]  
Gather A., 2019, Z ORTHOP UNFALL
[9]   An explorative, biomechanical analysis of spine motion during out-of-hospital extrication procedures [J].
Haeske, David ;
Schier, Lars ;
Weerts, Jeronimo O. N. ;
Gross, Berthold ;
Rittmann, Adrian ;
Gruetzner, Paul A. ;
Muenzberg, Matthias ;
Kreinest, Michael .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2020, 51 (02) :185-192
[10]  
Hauswald Mark, 2002, Curr Opin Crit Care, V8, P566, DOI 10.1097/00075198-200212000-00014