Maintenance and hysteresis of soil-root interface water potential of cherry-plum in response to soil dehydration and rehydration

被引:0
|
作者
Xu, HL [1 ]
Caron, J
Bernier, PY
Umemura, H
Gauthier, L
Gosselin, A
机构
[1] Int Nat Farming Res Ctr, Nagano 3901401, Japan
[2] Univ Laval, Hort Res Ctr, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
[3] Canadian Forest Serv, Nat Resources, Quebec City, PQ G1V 4C7, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE | 1999年 / 68卷 / 02期
关键词
artificial substrate; cherry-plum; hysteresis; soil-root interface water potential; water stress;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Soil- root interface water potential (psi(s.r)) of a dry soil indicates the water status at the interface between the soil and the root, but it cannot be easily measured although it is proposed as an appropriate indication of plant water stress. Using an equation of Ohm's analog, we estimated psi(s).(r) and examined the maintenance and hysteresis of psi(s).(r) as well as xylem water potential (psi(x))and transpiration rate (E-A) in response to soil dehydration and rehydration for cherry- plum plants (Prunus x cistena) grown in three artificial soil mixes. These mixes were made of composted bark, peat, and sand (Mix-l), pear, bark, sand, and compost (Mix-2), and peat, sawdust, and sand (Mix-3). When water was withheld and the soil matric potential (psi(m)) was lowered, plants grown in Mix-2 maintained higher psi(s).(r) as well as higher psi(x). However, when the soil mix was rehydrated, psi(s).(r) was always lower during the re-wetting than during the drying cycles. The relationship between psi(m) and psi(s).(r) showed a strong hysteresis-like behavior. Hysteresis was the largest in Mix-2 and the smallest in Mix- 3. Hysteresis of mu(x) or E-A showed a similar trend to that of psi(s).(r). The differences among soil mixes in hysteresis of psi(s).(r) might be related to the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of substrates.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 235
页数:8
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Influences of soil-root interface behavior on roots uptake soil water
    Huang, Mingbin
    Kang, Shaozhong
    1997,
  • [2] Root-soil air gap and resistance to water flow at the soil-root interface of Robinia pseudoacacia
    Liu, X. P.
    Zhang, W. J.
    Wang, X. Y.
    Cai, Y. J.
    Chang, J. G.
    TREE PHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 35 (12) : 1343 - 1355
  • [3] ROOT CLUMPING MAY AFFECT THE ROOT WATER POTENTIAL AND THE RESISTANCE TO SOIL-ROOT WATER TRANSPORT
    TARDIEU, F
    BRUCKLER, L
    LAFOLIE, F
    PLANT AND SOIL, 1992, 140 (02) : 291 - 301
  • [4] Combination of plant and soil water potential monitoring and modelling demonstrates soil-root hydraulic disconnection during drought
    Delval, Louis
    Vanderborght, Jan
    Javaux, Mathieu
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2024,
  • [5] Changes in water extractable metals, pH and organic carbon concentrations at the soil-root interface of forested soils
    Séguin, V
    Gagnon, C
    Courchesne, F
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2004, 260 (1-2) : 1 - 17
  • [6] Changes in water extractable metals, pH and organic carbon concentrations at the soil-root interface of forested soils
    Véronique Séguin
    Christian Gagnon
    François Courchesne
    Plant and Soil, 2004, 260 : 1 - 17
  • [7] INFLUENCE OF SOIL-WATER MATRIC POTENTIAL ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF PHYTOPHTHORA ROOT AND CROWN ROTS OF MAHALEB CHERRY
    WILCOX, WF
    MIRCETICH, SM
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1985, 75 (06) : 648 - 653
  • [8] CORN AND COTTON ROOT-GROWTH IN RESPONSE TO SOIL IMPEDANCE AND WATER POTENTIAL
    BARYOSEF, B
    LAMBERT, JR
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1981, 45 (05) : 930 - 935
  • [9] 'Ben Lear' and 'Stevens' cranberry root and shoot growth response to soil water potential
    Baumann, DL
    Workmaster, BA
    Kosola, KR
    HORTSCIENCE, 2005, 40 (03) : 795 - 798
  • [10] RESPONSE OF ROOT AND SHOOT GROWTH OF 3 GRASS SPECIES TO DECREASES IN SOIL-WATER POTENTIAL
    MAJERUS, ME
    JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1975, 28 (06): : 473 - 476