Become the PPUPET Master: Mastering Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment With the Pediatric Pressure Ulcer Prediction and Evaluation Tool (PPUPET)

被引:12
作者
Sterken, David J. [1 ]
Mooney, JoAnn [2 ]
Ropele, Diana [3 ]
Kett, Alysha [4 ]
Vander Laan, Karen J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Helen DeVos Childrens Hosp, Serv Pediat, Grand Rapids, MI 49503 USA
[2] Helen DeVos Childrens Hosp, Qual Improvement, Grand Rapids, MI USA
[3] Helen DeVos Childrens Hosp, Pediat Trauma Serv, Grand Rapids, MI USA
[4] Spectrum Hlth, Grand Rapids, MI USA
[5] Spectrum Hlth Hosp, Ctr Nursing Practice & Dev, Grand Rapids, MI USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES | 2015年 / 30卷 / 04期
关键词
Hospital acquired pressure ulcer (HAPU); Pressure ulcer; Pediatric pressure ulcers; PPUPET;
D O I
10.1016/j.pedn.2014.10.004
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Hospital acquired pressure ulcers (HAPU) are serious, debilitating, and preventable complications in all inpatient populations. Despite evidence of the development of pressure ulcers in the pediatric population, minimal research has been done. Based on observations gathered during quarterly HAPU audits, bedside nursing staff recognized trends in pressure ulcer locations that were not captured using current pressure ulcer risk assessment tools. Together, bedside nurses and nursing leadership created and conducted multiple research studies to investigate the validity and reliability of the Pediatric Pressure Ulcer Prediction and Evaluation Tool (PPUPET). (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:598 / 610
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment of the risk of pressure ulcer during the perioperative period: Adaptation of the Munro scale to Turkish
    Gul, Asiye
    Sengul, Tuba
    Yavuz, Hafize Ozge
    JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY, 2021, 30 (04) : 559 - 565
  • [42] PURPOSE T in Swedish hospital wards and nursing homes: A psychometric evaluation of a new pressure ulcer risk assessment instrument
    Hultin, Lisa
    Karlsson, Ann-Christin
    Ohrvall, Margareta
    Coleman, Susanne
    Gunningberg, Lena
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2020, 29 (21-22) : 4066 - 4075
  • [43] Ethnicity in pressure ulcer risk assessment, with specific relation to the Pakistani ethnic minority in Burton, England
    Anthony, D
    Johnson, M
    Reynolds, T
    Russell, L
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2002, 38 (06) : 592 - 597
  • [44] Comparison of the predictive validity among pressure ulcer risk assessment scales for surgical ICU patients
    Kim, Eun-Kyung
    Lee, Sun-Mi
    Lee, Eunpyo
    Eom, Mi-Ran
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2009, 26 (04) : 87 - 94
  • [45] Comparing the Accuracy of the Braden and the Waterlow Scales for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment in Intensive Care Unit
    Valiee, Sina
    Nemati, Syede
    Hossaini, Midia
    Kashefi, Hajar
    Mohammadi, Hiwa
    NURSING AND MIDWIFERY STUDIES, 2022, 11 (02) : 160 - 165
  • [46] Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool-updated version (PUKAT 2.0)
    Dalli, Oznur Erbay
    Yildirim, Yasemin
    CaliSkan, Gulbahar
    Girgin, Nermin Kelebek
    JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY, 2022, 31 (01) : 52 - 57
  • [47] Establishing the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: a novel approach using illustrated patient scenarios
    Gould, D
    Goldstone, L
    Gammon, J
    Kelly, D
    Maidwell, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2002, 39 (02) : 215 - 228
  • [48] Turkish Nurses' Opinions of the Braden and Waterlow Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scales: A Descriptive Pilot Study
    Avsar, Pinar
    Karadag, Ayise
    OSTOMY WOUND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 62 (02) : 34 - 40
  • [49] Predictive accuracy of the Braden Q Scale in risk assessment for paediatric pressure ulcer: A meta-analysis
    Liao, Yaoji
    Gao, Guozhen
    Mo, Lulu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCES, 2018, 5 (04): : 419 - 426
  • [50] Assessing the Validity and Reliability of a New Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale for Patients in Intensive Care Units
    Efteli, Elcin
    Gunes, Ulku
    WOUND MANAGEMENT & PREVENTION, 2020, 66 (02) : 24 - 33