Prognostic Role of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement in Patients With Nondialysis Chronic Kidney Disease

被引:3
|
作者
Minutolo, Roberto [1 ,2 ]
Agarwal, Rajiv [3 ,4 ]
Borrelli, Silvio [1 ,2 ]
Chiodini, Paolo [5 ]
Bellizzi, Vincenzo [6 ]
Nappi, Felice [7 ]
Cianciaruso, Bruno [8 ]
Zamboli, Pasquale [1 ,2 ]
Conte, Giuseppe [1 ,2 ]
Gabbai, Francis B. [9 ,10 ]
De Nicola, Luca [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples 2, Dept Nephrol, I-80125 Naples, Italy
[2] Univ Naples 2, Santa Maria Popolo Incurbili Hosp Azienda Sanitar, I-80125 Naples, Italy
[3] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Nephrol, Indianapolis, IN USA
[4] Richard L Roudebush Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[5] Univ Naples 2, Dept Med & Publ Hlth, I-80125 Naples, Italy
[6] Univ Hosp, Div Nephrol, Salerno, Italy
[7] Cty Hosp, Div Nephrol, Nola, Italy
[8] Univ Naples Federico II, Div Nephrol, Naples, Italy
[9] Vet Affairs San Diego Healthcare Syst, Dept Med, San Diego, CA USA
[10] Univ Calif San Diego, Sch Med, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
CORONARY-HEART-DISEASE; CHRONIC RENAL IMPAIRMENT; WHITE-COAT HYPERTENSION; DIABETIC-NEPHROPATHY; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS; FOLLOW-UP; PROGRESSION; MORTALITY; DEATH;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurement allows a better risk stratification in essential hypertension compared with office blood pressure measurement, but its prognostic role in nondialysis chronic kidney disease has been poorly investigated. Methods: The prognostic role of daytime and nighttime systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) in comparison with office measurements was evaluated in 436 consecutive patients with chronic kidney disease. Primary end points were time to renal death (end-stage renal disease or death) and time to fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. Quintiles of BP were used to classify patients. Results: The mean (SD) age of the patients was 65.1 (13.6) years, and the glomerular filtration rate was 42.9 (19.7) mL/min/1.73 m(2); 41.7% of the participants were women, 36.5% had diabetes, and 30.5% had cardiovascular disease. Office-measured SBP/DBP values were 146 (19)/82(12) mm Hg; daytime SBP/DBP was 131 (17)/75 (11) mm Hg, and nighttime SBP/DBP was 122(20)/66 (10) mm Hg. During follow-up (median, 4.2 years), 155 and 103 patients reached the renal and cardiovascular end points, respectively. Compared with a daytime SBP of 126 to 135 mm Hg, patients with an SBP of 136 to 146 mm Hg and those with an SBP higher than 146 mm Hg had an increased adjusted risk of the cardiovascular end point (hazard ratio [HR], 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-4.41 and 3.07; 1.54-6.09) and renal death (1.72; 1.02-2.89 and 1.85; 1.11-3.08). Nighttime SBPs of 125 to 137 mm Hg and higher than 137 mm Hg also increased the risk of the cardiovascular end point (HR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.11-5.71 and 4.00; 1.77-9.02) and renal end point (1.87; 1.03-3.43 and 2.54; 1.41-4.57) with respect to the reference SBP value of 106-114 mm Hg. Office measurement of BP did not predict the risk of the renal or cardiovascular end point. Patients who were nondippers and those who were reverse dippers had a greater risk of both end points. Conclusion: In chronic kidney disease, ambulatory BP measurement and, in particular, nighttime BP measurement, allows more accurate prediction of renal and cardiovascular risk; office measurement of BP does not predict any outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:1090 / 1098
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prognostic value of nighttime blood pressure load in Chinese patients with nondialysis chronic kidney disease
    Li, Yan
    Deng, Qiongxia
    Li, Huiqun
    Ma, Xinxin
    Zhang, Jun
    Peng, Hui
    Wang, Cheng
    Lou, Tanqi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2017, 19 (09): : 890 - 898
  • [2] Prognostic importance of ambulatory blood pressure recordings in patients with chronic kidney disease
    Agarwal, R
    Andersen, MJ
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 69 (07) : 1175 - 1180
  • [3] Role and prognostic value of individual ambulatory blood pressure components in chronic kidney disease
    Fabio Angeli
    Giorgio Gentile
    Monica Trapasso
    Paolo Verdecchia
    Gianpaolo Reboldi
    Journal of Human Hypertension, 2018, 32 : 625 - 632
  • [4] Role and prognostic value of individual ambulatory blood pressure components in chronic kidney disease
    Angeli, Fabio
    Gentile, Giorgio
    Trapasso, Monica
    Verdecchia, Paolo
    Reboldi, Gianpaolo
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2018, 32 (8-9) : 625 - 632
  • [5] The Prognostic Role of Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurement in Hypertensive Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
    Psounis, Konstantinos
    Andreadis, Emmanuel
    Oikonomaki, Theodora
    Roumeliotis, Stefanos
    Margellos, Vasileios
    Thodis, Elias
    Passadakis, Ploumis
    Panagoutsos, Stylianos
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (10)
  • [6] Comparison of the prognostic significance of blood pressure measurement by unattended automatic office blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure in subjects with chronic kidney disease
    Seo, J. W.
    Park, S. H.
    Lee, C. J.
    Choi, D. H.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 : 57 - 58
  • [7] Short-termblood pressure variability in nondialysis chronic kidney disease patients: correlates and prognostic role on the progression of renal disease
    Borrelli, Silvio
    Garofalo, Carlo
    Mallamaci, Francesca
    Tripepi, Giovanni
    Stanzione, Giovanna
    Provenzano, Michele
    Conte, Giuseppe
    De Nicola, Luca
    Zoccali, Carmine
    Minutolo, Roberto
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2018, 36 (12) : 2398 - 2405
  • [8] Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Chronic Kidney Disease
    Cohen, Debbie L.
    Huan, Yonghong
    Townsend, Raymond R.
    CURRENT HYPERTENSION REPORTS, 2013, 15 (03) : 160 - 166
  • [9] Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Chronic Kidney Disease
    Debbie L. Cohen
    Yonghong Huan
    Raymond R. Townsend
    Current Hypertension Reports, 2013, 15 : 160 - 166
  • [10] Hypertension in chronic kidney disease: Role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
    VanDeVoorde, Rene G., III
    Mitsnefes, Mark M.
    PROGRESS IN PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 41 : 67 - 73