Comparison of Two Predictive Models of Sepsis in Critically Ill Patients Based on the Combined Use of Inflammatory Markers

被引:5
作者
Li, Xiaoming [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Chao [2 ]
Wang, Xiaoli [1 ]
Mao, Zhi [2 ]
Yi, Hongyu [1 ]
Zhou, Feihu [2 ]
机构
[1] Med Sch Chinese PLA, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Med Ctr 1, Dept Crit Care Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
nomogram; score; model; prediction; inflammatory marker; sepsis; IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY; PROCALCITONIN; INTERLEUKIN-6; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.2147/IJGM.S348797
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Sepsis is a systemic inflammatory response due to infection, resulting in organ dysfunction. Timely targeted interventions can improve prognosis. Inflammation plays a crucial role in the process of sepsis. To identify potential sepsis early, we developed and validated a nomogram model and a simple risk scoring model for predicting sepsis in critically ill patients. Methods: The medical records of adult patients admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) from August 2017 to December 2020 were analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (70%) and a validation cohort (30%). A nomogram model was developed through multivariate logistic regression analysis. The continuous variables included in nomogram model were transformed into dichotomous variables. Then, a multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed based on these dichotomous variables, and the odds ratio (OR) for each variable was used to construct a simple risk scoring model. The receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were constructed, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Results: A total of 2074 patients were enrolled. Finally, white blood cell (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were included in our models. The AUC of the nomogram model and the simple risk scoring model were 0.854 and 0.842, respectively. The prediction performance of the two models on sepsis is comparable (p = 0.1298). Conclusion: This study combining five commonly available inflammatory markers (WBC, CRP, IL-6, PCT and NLR) developed a nomogram model and a simple risk scoring model to predict sepsis in critically ill patients. Although the prediction performance of the two models is comparable, the simple risk scoring model may be simpler and more practical for clinicians to identify potential sepsis in critically ill patients at an early stage and strategize treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:1013 / 1022
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Mortality prediction model from combined serial lactate, procalcitonin and calprotectin levels in critically ill patients with sepsis: A retrospective study according to Sepsis-3 definition [J].
de Guadiana-Romualdo, Luis Garcia ;
Botella, Lourdes Albert ;
Rojas, Carlos Rodriguez ;
Candel, Angela Puche ;
Sanchez, Roberto Jimenez ;
Zamora, Pablo Conesa ;
Albaladejo-Oton, Maria Dolores ;
Allegue-Gallego, Jose Manuel .
MEDICINA INTENSIVA, 2024, 48 (11) :629-638
[42]   The burden of sepsis in critically ill patients with multiple sclerosis: A population-based cohort study [J].
Oud, Lavi ;
Garza, John .
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 69
[43]   Construction and validation of prognostic models in critically Ill patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: interpretable machine learning approach [J].
Fan, Zhiyan ;
Jiang, Jiamei ;
Xiao, Chen ;
Chen, Youlei ;
Xia, Quan ;
Wang, Juan ;
Fang, Mengjuan ;
Wu, Zesheng ;
Chen, Fanghui .
JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2023, 21 (01)
[44]   Predictive value of antithrombin III and serum C-reactive protein concentration in critically ill patients with suspected sepsis [J].
Pettilä, V ;
Pentti, J ;
Pettilä, M ;
Takkunen, O ;
Jousela, I .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 30 (02) :271-275
[45]   Clinical Decision-Support Systems for Detection of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Sepsis, and Septic Shock in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review [J].
Wulff, Antje ;
Montag, Sara ;
Marschollek, Michael ;
Jack, Thomas .
METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2019, 58 :e43-e57
[46]   Comparison of scoring systems: SOFA, APACHE-II, LODS, MODS, and SAPS-II in critically ill elderly sepsis patients [J].
Tekin, Bilal ;
Kilic, Jehat ;
Taskin, Guerhan ;
Solmaz, Ihsan ;
Tezel, Onur ;
Basgoz, Bilgin Bahadir .
JOURNAL OF INFECTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2024, 18 (01) :122-130
[47]   Obesity, inflammatory and thrombotic markers, and major clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19 in the US [J].
Friedman, Allon N. ;
Guirguis, John ;
Kapoor, Rajat ;
Gupta, Shruti ;
Leaf, David E. ;
Timsina, Lava R. .
OBESITY, 2021, 29 (10) :1719-1730
[48]   Insulin sensitivity and, sepsis score: A correlation between model-based metric and sepsis scoring system in critically ill patients [J].
Suhaimi, Fatanah M. ;
Chase, J. Geoffrey ;
Pretty, Christopher G. ;
Shaw, Geoffrey M. ;
Razak, Normy N. ;
Jamaludin, Ummu K. .
BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2017, 32 :112-123
[49]   Comparison of outcomes of community-acquired sepsis and hospital-acquired sepsis in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Lamichhane, Pratik ;
Kalansuriya, Imesha ;
Manhalattummal, Muhammed Faris ;
Khanal, Kapil ;
Agrawal, Anushka ;
Pasam, Tejaswi ;
Pandit, Pukar .
ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2025, 87 (03) :1569-1575
[50]   Changes of plasma acetylcholine and inflammatory markers in critically ill patients during early enteral nutrition: A prospective observational study [J].
Gao Tao ;
Cheng Min-Hua ;
Xi Feng-Chan ;
Chen Yan ;
Su Ting ;
Li Wei-Qin ;
Yu Wen-Kui .
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 52 :219-226