MRI pelvic landmark angles in the assessment of apical pelvic organ prolapse

被引:12
作者
Ginath, Shimon [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Garely, Alan [3 ]
Luchs, Jonathan S. [5 ]
Shahryarinejad, Azin [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Olivera, Cedric [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhou, Sue [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ascher-Walsh, Charles [2 ]
Condrea, Alexander [1 ]
Brodman, Michael [2 ]
Vardy, Michael [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Holon & Sackler Sch Med, E Wolfson Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, New York, NY USA
[3] Winthrop Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Mineola, NY 11501 USA
[4] Englewood Hosp & Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Englewood, CO USA
[5] Winthrop Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Mineola, NY 11501 USA
关键词
h angle; MRI; Pelvic Xoor landmarks; Uterine prolapse; FLOOR RELAXATION; REFERENCE LINES; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-010-1648-1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to evaluate the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pelvic landmark angles and lines in the assessment of apical vault prolapse. Seventeen women were evaluated as part of a prospective surgical trial. Baseline data are presented as a pilot study of the utility of MRI in addition to this evaluation of 6 nulliparous volunteers without prolapse and 11 parous women with symptomatic a parts per thousand yen stage II uterine prolapse. Each patient underwent assessment for pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) and pelvic MRI. Pelvic landmark angles and lines were measured. Mann-Whitney Rank sum test and Spearman's Rank order correlation test were used to assess agreement. Women with prolapse had a significantly larger h angle, g angle, and e angle at rest than those without prolapse. Correlation between apical vault descent was measured clinically by POPQ point C with MRI measurements: h angle (r = 0.61, p = 0.01), g angle (r = 0.64, p = 0.005), and e angle (r = 0.62, p = 0.007). MRI measurements of pelvic landmark angles reliably differentiate between women with and without uterine prolapse and correlate best with POPQ point C.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 370
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pelvic organ prolapse: An overview
    Smith, Taryn A.
    Poteat, Tamara A.
    Shobeiri, S. Abbas
    JAAPA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS, 2014, 27 (03): : 20 - 24
  • [22] Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse
    Brubaker L.
    Maher C.
    Jacquetin B.
    Rajamaheswari N.
    Von Theobald P.
    Norton P.
    Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, 2010, 16 (01): : 9 - 19
  • [23] Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse
    Patel, Devin N.
    Anger, Jennifer T.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2016, 26 (04) : 302 - 308
  • [24] On the Alert for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Muller, Nancy
    OSTOMY WOUND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 56 (08) : 26 - 26
  • [25] Pathophysiology of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Word, R. Ann
    Pathi, Sujatha
    Schaffer, Joseph I.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 36 (03) : 521 - +
  • [26] Obesity and pelvic organ prolapse
    Lee, Una J.
    Kerkhof, Manon H.
    van Leijsen, Sanne A.
    Heesakkers, John P.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2017, 27 (05) : 428 - 434
  • [27] Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Madhu, Chendrimada Kaveriappa
    Hashim, Hashim
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2018, 17 (03) : 119 - 125
  • [28] Outcomes of observation as therapy for pelvic organ prolapse: A study in the natural history of pelvic organ prolapse
    Gilchrist, Alienor S.
    Campbell, William
    Steele, Hannah
    Brazell, Hema
    Foote, Jonathon
    Swift, Steven
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2013, 32 (04) : 383 - 386
  • [29] The effectiveness of two different laparoscopic surgeries for apical support of pelvic organ prolapse
    Li, Shunshuang
    Ji, Mei
    Zhao, Zhao
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2015, 188 : 74 - 78
  • [30] Surgical Outcomes and Safety of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy in Women With Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Sung, Hyun Hwan
    Ko, Kwang Jin
    Suh, Yoon Seok
    Ryu, Gyu Ha
    Lee, Kyu-Sung
    INTERNATIONAL NEUROUROLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 21 (01) : 68 - 74