The Clinical Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Combination With T2-Weighted Imaging in Diagnosing Prostate Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:126
作者
Wu, Lian-Ming [1 ]
Xu, Jian-Rong [1 ]
Ye, Yong-Quan [2 ]
Lu, Qing [1 ]
Hu, Jia-Ni [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Renji Hosp, Shanghai 200127, Peoples R China
[2] Wayne State Univ, Dept Radiol, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
diffusion-weighted imaging; meta-analysis; prostate carcinoma; systematic review; T2-weighted imaging; SEMINAL-VESICLE INVASION; PHASED-ARRAY COIL; EXTRACAPSULAR EXTENSION; CANCER DETECTION; INCREMENTAL VALUE; COEFFICIENT MAP; T; LOCALIZATION; PREDICTION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.11.7634
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. We aimed to explore the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in combination with T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) in detecting prostate carcinoma through a systematic review and meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cancerlit, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published from January 2001 to July 2011 evaluating the diagnostic performance of T2WI combined with DWI in detecting prostate carcinoma. We determined sensitivities and specificities across studies, calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios, and constructed summary receiver operating characteristic curves. We also compared the performance of T2WI combined with DWI with T2WI alone by analyzing studies that had also used these diagnostic methods on the same patients. RESULTS. Across 10 studies (627 patients), the pooled sensitivity of T2WI combined with DWI was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.65-0.84), and the pooled specificity was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.77-0.87). Overall, the positive likelihood ratio was 4.31 (95% CI, 3.12-5.92), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.29 (95% CI, 0.20-0.43). In seven studies in which T2WI combined with DWI and T2WI alone were performed, the sensitivity and specificity of T2WI combined with DWI were 0.72 (95% CI, 0.67-0.82) and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76-0.86), respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity of T2WI alone were 0.62 (95% CI, 0.55-0.68) and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.71-0.82), respectively. CONCLUSION. T2WI combined with DWI may be a valuable tool for detecting prostate cancer in the overall evaluation of prostate cancer, compared with T2WI alone. High-quality prospective studies of T2WI combined with DWI to detect prostate carcinoma still need to be conducted.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 110
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Cancer Facts Figures 2008
[2]   PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA - STAGING WITH MR IMAGING AT 1.5-T [J].
BEZZI, M ;
KRESSEL, HY ;
ALLEN, KS ;
SCHIEBLER, ML ;
ALTMAN, HG ;
WEIN, AJ ;
POLLACK, HM .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 169 (02) :339-346
[3]   Prostate cancer: Accurate determination of extracapsular extension with high-spatial-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR imaging - Initial results [J].
Bloch, B. Nicolas ;
Furman-Haran, Edna ;
Helbich, Thomas H. ;
Lenkinski, Robert E. ;
Degani, Hadassa ;
Kratzik, Christian ;
Susani, Martin ;
Haitel, Andrea ;
Jaromi, Silvia ;
Ngo, Long ;
Rofsky, Neil M. .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 245 (01) :176-185
[4]   Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the detection and localization of prostate cancer: combination of T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging [J].
Delongchamps, Nicolas Barry ;
Rouanne, Mathieu ;
Flam, Thierry ;
Beuvon, Frederic ;
Liberatore, Mathieu ;
Zerbib, Marc ;
Cornud, Francois .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 107 (09) :1411-1418
[5]   Local staging of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis [J].
Engelbrecht, MR ;
Jager, GJ ;
Laheij, RJ ;
Verbeek, ALM ;
van Lier, HJ ;
Barentsz, JO .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (09) :2294-2302
[6]   Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils - Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging [J].
Futterer, Jurgen J. ;
Engelbrecht, Marc R. ;
Jager, Gerrit J. ;
Hartman, Robert P. ;
King, Bernard F. ;
Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, Christina A. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (04) :1055-1065
[7]   Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer [J].
Haider, Masoom A. ;
van der Kwast, Theodorus H. ;
Tanguay, Jeff ;
Evans, Andrew J. ;
Hashmi, Ali-Tahir ;
Lockwood, Gina ;
Trachtenberg, John .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (02) :323-328
[8]   Relationship between Apparent Diffusion Coefficients at 3.0-T MR Imaging and Gleason Grade in Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer [J].
Hambrock, Thomas ;
Somford, Diederik M. ;
Huisman, Henkjan J. ;
van Oort, Inge M. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A. ;
Scheenen, Thomas ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 259 (02) :453-461
[9]   A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies [J].
Harbord, Roger M. ;
Deeks, Jonathan J. ;
Egger, Matthias ;
Whiting, Penny ;
Sterne, Jonathan A. C. .
BIOSTATISTICS, 2007, 8 (02) :239-251
[10]  
Hatano Koji, 2010, Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi, V101, P603