Intensity of Aphasia Therapy: Evidence and Efficacy

被引:59
作者
Cherney, Leora R. [1 ]
Patterson, Janet P. [2 ]
Raymer, Anastasia M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Rehabil Inst Chicago, Ctr Aphasia Res & Treatment, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] VA No Calif Hlth Care Syst, Audiol & Speech Pathol Serv, Martinez, CA 94553 USA
[3] Old Dominion Univ, Child Study Ctr 110, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA
关键词
Aphasia; Acquired aphasia; Rehabilitation; Language therapy; Treatment intensity; Treatment outcomes; Treatment efficacy; Systematic review; CONSTRAINT-INDUCED APHASIA; LANGUAGE THERAPY; SOCIAL-PARTICIPATION; NONFLUENT APHASIA; BRAIN PLASTICITY; RECOVERY; STROKE; REHABILITATION; SPEECH; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1007/s11910-011-0227-6
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Determining the optimal amount and intensity of treatment is essential to the design and implementation of any treatment program for aphasia. A growing body of evidence, both behavioral and biological, suggests that intensive therapy positively impacts outcomes. We update a systematic review of treatment studies that directly compares conditions of higher and lower intensity treatment for aphasia. We identify five studies published since 2006, review them for methodologic quality, and synthesize their findings with previous ones. For both acute and chronic aphasia, results at the language impairment and communication activity/participation levels tend to be more equivocal than previously demonstrated, with no clear differences between intensive and nonintensive treatment emerging across studies. Future research directions are discussed including research design, definitions of treatment intensity, and behavioral and biological measurement of short- and long-term changes following implementation of an intensive treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:560 / 569
页数:10
相关论文
共 64 条
[21]   Brain-Mapping Techniques for Evaluating Poststroke Recovery and Rehabilitation: A Review [J].
Eliassen, James C. ;
Boespflug, Erin L. ;
Lamy, Martine ;
Allendorfer, Jane ;
Chu, Wen-Jang ;
Szaflarski, Jerzy P. .
TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2008, 15 (05) :427-450
[22]   Preservation and Modulation of Specific Left Hemisphere Regions is Vital for Treated Recovery from Anomia in Stroke [J].
Fridriksson, Julius .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 30 (35) :11558-11564
[23]   Evidence-based systematic review: Oropharyngeal dysphagia behavioral treatments. Part I-Background and methodology [J].
Frymark, Tobi ;
Schooling, Tracy ;
Mullen, Robert ;
Wheeler-Hegland, Karen ;
Ashford, John ;
McCabe, Daniel ;
Musson, Nan ;
Hammond, Carol Smith .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 46 (02) :175-183
[24]   Use of fMRI in the Study of Chronic Aphasia Recovery After Therapy: A Case Study [J].
Harnish, Stacy M. ;
Neils-Strunjas, Jean ;
Lamy, Martine ;
Eliassen, James .
TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2008, 15 (05) :468-483
[25]   The impact of stroke: are people with aphasia different to those without? [J].
Hilari, Katerina .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 33 (03) :211-218
[26]   Comparing the outcomes of intensive and non-intensive context-based aphasia treatment [J].
Hinckley, JJ ;
Carr, TH .
APHASIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (10-11) :965-974
[27]   Influence of rate of treatment on the naming abilities of adults with chronic aphasia [J].
Hinckley, JJ ;
Craig, HK .
APHASIOLOGY, 1998, 12 (11) :989-1006
[28]   Piracetam as an adjuvant to language therapy for aphasia: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study [J].
Huber, W ;
Willmes, K ;
Poeck, K ;
VanVleymen, B ;
Deberdt, W .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1997, 78 (03) :245-250
[29]  
Kelly H., 2010, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V12
[30]   Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: Implications for rehabilitation after brain damage [J].
Kleim, Jeffrey A. ;
Jones, Theresa A. .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2008, 51 (01) :S225-S239