The stability of youth popular opinion leaders selected over time using social network analysis

被引:5
作者
Waterman, Emily A. [1 ]
Edwards, Katie M. [2 ,3 ]
Keyes, Antoni B. [1 ]
Zulfiqar, Hafsa [1 ]
Banyard, Victoria L. [4 ]
Valente, Thomas W. [5 ]
机构
[1] Bennington Coll, Dev Psychol, 1 Coll Dr, Bennington, VT 05201 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Nebraska Ctr Res Children Youth Families, Lincoln, NE USA
[3] Univ Nebraska, Sch Educ Psychol, Lincoln, NE USA
[4] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Social Work, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[5] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Prevent Med, Keck Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
关键词
friendship; prevention; sexual violence; social networks; FRIENDSHIP NETWORKS; PREVENTION; DIFFUSION; CENTRALITY; RISK; INNOVATIONS; ABUSE;
D O I
10.1002/ajcp.12595
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Community interventions that use social network analysis to identify and involve influential individuals are promising for behavior change. However, youth friendships are often unstable. The current study examined the stability of the youth selected as influential in a friendship social network, that is, the degree to which youth selected at one time point were also selected at subsequent time points. Influential youth, also called popular opinion leaders (POLs), were selected to be part of a community-wide sexual violence prevention initiative. POLs were selected based on high in-degree (number of times an individual was nominated as a best friend by another student). We found that POLs were unstable: only 29.81%-41.01% of POLs were stable across time. The percentage of POLs who were stable decreased across time. No factors (social identities, behavioral, attitudinal) consistently predicted POL stability. Although these findings are in need of replications, social network interventions for youth may need to repeatedly select new POLs to account for instability.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 210
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Albert D, 2011, INHIBITORY CONTROL AND DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION: FROM RESEARCH TO TRANSLATION, P211, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-1268-8_11
[2]   How Do We Know If It Works? Measuring Outcomes in Bystander-Focused Abuse Prevention on Campuses [J].
Banyard, Victoria L. ;
Moynihan, Mary M. ;
Cares, Alison C. ;
Warner, Rebecca .
PSYCHOLOGY OF VIOLENCE, 2014, 4 (01) :101-115
[3]  
Berkowitz A.D., 2010, The prevention of sexual violence: A practitioner's sourcebook, P147, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.CHIABU.2008.12.006
[4]   Diffusion of innovations and HIV/AIDS [J].
Bertrand, JT .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2004, 9 :113-121
[5]  
Borgatti Stephen, 2018, ANAL SOCIAL NETWORKS, DOI DOI 10.1080/0022250X.2015.1053371
[6]   Monthly changes in the composition of friendship networks in early adolescence [J].
Chan, Alessandra ;
Poulin, Francois .
MERRILL-PALMER QUARTERLY-JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 53 (04) :578-602
[7]   RCT Testing Bystander Effectiveness to Reduce Violence [J].
Coker, Ann L. ;
Bush, Heather M. ;
Cook-Craig, Patricia G. ;
DeGue, Sarah A. ;
Clear, Emily R. ;
Brancato, Candace J. ;
Fisher, Bonnie S. ;
Recktenwald, Eileen A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 52 (05) :566-578
[8]   Challenge and Opportunity in Evaluating a Diffusion-Based Active Bystanding Prevention Program: Green Dot in High Schools [J].
Cook-Craig, Patricia G. ;
Coker, Ann L. ;
Clear, Emily R. ;
Garcia, Lisandra S. ;
Bush, Heather M. ;
Brancato, Candace J. ;
Williams, Corrine M. ;
Fisher, Bonnie S. .
VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN, 2014, 20 (10) :1179-1202
[9]   The stability of centrality measures when networks are sampled [J].
Costenbader, E ;
Valente, TW .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2003, 25 (04) :283-307
[10]  
Degirmencioglu SM, 1998, MERRILL PALMER QUART, V44, P313