Prognostic utility of FDG PET/CT and bone scintigraphy in breast cancer patients with bone-only metastasis

被引:12
作者
Park, Soyeon [1 ]
Yoon, Joon-Kee [1 ]
Lee, Su Jin [1 ]
Kang, Seok Yun [2 ]
Yim, Hyunee [3 ]
An, Young-Sil [1 ]
机构
[1] Ajou Univ, Sch Med, Dept Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, Suwon, South Korea
[2] Ajou Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hematol Oncol, Suwon, South Korea
[3] Ajou Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Suwon, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography; bone scintigraphy; bone-only metastasis; breast cancer; overall survival; EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY/COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MANAGEMENT; COMPLICATIONS; LESIONS; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000008985
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We performed this retrospective clinical study to examine the prognostic power of bone scintigraphy (BS) and F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) in terms of overall survival (OS) of breast cancer with bone-only metastasis. We retrospectively evaluated 100 female invasive ductal breast cancer patients (mean age 48.1 years) with bone-only metastasis. Twenty-five patients had human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive tumors, 65 were estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR)-positive, HER2-negative tumors, and 10 were triple negative tumors. The patients were treated properly with various treatments, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormone, and bisphosphonate therapy, based on their clinical status. All patients underwent BS and FDG PET/CT at baseline and 1 year after treatment. The baseline and follow images were visually compared, and the patients were grouped as responders or nonresponders based on their images. OS was compared between the groups. The mean OS after the diagnosis of bone-only metastasis was 57.6 months. Fifty-one patients (51%) died within 5 years after diagnosis of metastasis. No difference in survival was evident between responders and nonresponders based on BS imaging data (P=.090). The response status based on PET imaging data waste only significant independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (P=.001). Survival was lower in nonresponders than in responders based on PET imaging (32.7% vs 66.4%; P<.001). Our findings suggest that the response status according to FDG PET imaging can be used to predict OS in breast cancer patients with bone-only metastasis.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Prognostic Factors for Patients with Bone-Only Metastasis in Breast Cancer [J].
Ahn, Sung Gwe ;
Lee, Hak Min ;
Cho, Sang-Hoon ;
Lee, Seung Ah ;
Hwang, Seung Hyun ;
Jeong, Joon ;
Lee, Hy-De .
YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 54 (05) :1168-1177
[2]   Breast cancer metastasis to the bone: mechanisms of bone loss [J].
Chen, Yu-Chi ;
Sosnoski, Donna M. ;
Mastro, Andrea M. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 12 (06)
[3]   Clinical course and prognostic factors following bone recurrence from breast cancer [J].
Coleman, RE ;
Smith, P ;
Rubens, RD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 77 (02) :336-340
[4]   Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity [J].
Coleman, Robert E. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2006, 12 (20) :6243S-6249S
[5]   Imaging Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer: Staging and Response Assessment [J].
Cook, Gary J. R. ;
Azad, Gurdip K. ;
Goh, Vicky .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 57 :27S-33S
[6]   Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer by 18FDG PET:: Differing metabolic activity in osteoblastic and osteolytic lesions [J].
Cook, GJ ;
Houston, S ;
Rubens, R ;
Maisey, MN ;
Fogelman, I .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (10) :3375-3379
[7]  
COOMBES RC, 1983, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V52, P610, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19830815)52:4<610::AID-CNCR2820520406>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-5
[9]  
Domchek SM, 2000, CANCER, V89, P363, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20000715)89:2<363::AID-CNCR22>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-3