Power Relations in Multistakeholder Initiatives-A Case Study of the German Initiative on Sustainable Cocoa (GISCO)

被引:3
作者
Schuster, Daniel [1 ]
Mossig, Ivo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bremen, Dept Geog, D-28359 Bremen, Germany
关键词
multistakeholder initiatives; network governance; actors; wicked problems; collaboration; GPN; power relations; institutions; GLOBAL PRODUCTION NETWORKS; WICKED PROBLEMS; STAKEHOLDER; COLLABORATION; TRUST;
D O I
10.3390/su141811279
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Multistakeholder initiatives (MSIs) are formalized networks with member organizations from the private, public and not-for-profit sector. Even though members interact to achieve sustainability goals they cannot reach alone, research indicates that they are heterogeneous actors with their own and sometimes conflicting goals. There is no consensus in the literature regarding how those conflicting goals are negotiated. Power is seen as an important factor affecting network governance, but various concepts exist which can be applied to MSIs to different degrees. We explore the impact of person-, organization- and network-based power relations among actors in an MSI on the achievement of its own goals. To this end, we conducted 18 qualitative expert interviews with people involved in the MSI to explore decision making. Our results show that institutionally defined subgroups with similar actors (stakeholder groups) collectively represent their interest in the MSI. All stakeholder groups thus have a specific form of group-based organizational power. Our study shows that these are not negotiated; consequently, the MSI faces constraints in terms of dysfunctional power relations, as well as obstacles to finding solutions for sustainability issues on a global scale.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], GISCO OVERALL OBJECT
  • [2] Bathelt H., 2002, GEOGR ANN, V84 B, P93, DOI [10.1111/j.0435-3684.2002.00116.x, DOI 10.1111/J.0435-3684.2002.00116.X]
  • [3] Bathelt Harald., 2011, The Relational Economy: Geographies of Knowing and Learning
  • [4] Collaborative Governance and the Challenges of Network-Based Research
    Berardo, Ramiro
    Fischer, Manuel
    Hamilton, Matthew
    [J]. AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2020, 50 (08) : 898 - 913
  • [5] Bogner A., 2014, Interviews mit Experten: Eine praxisorientierte Einfuhrung
  • [6] Pursuing sustainability through multi-stakeholder collaboration: A description of the governance, actions, and perceived impacts of the roundtables for sustainable beef
    Buckley, Kristy J.
    Newton, Peter
    Gibbs, Holly K.
    McConnel, Ian
    Ehrmann, John
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 121 : 203 - 217
  • [7] Bueger C., 2017, Technology and World Politics, V1st, P42
  • [8] Sustainability governance of chains and networks: a review and future outlook
    Bush, Simon R.
    Oosterveer, Peter
    Bailey, Megan
    Mol, Arthur P. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 107 : 8 - 19
  • [9] Private authority and public policy interactions in global context: Governance spheres for problem solving
    Cashore, Benjamin
    Knudsen, Jette Steen
    Moon, Jeremy
    van der Ven, Hamish
    [J]. REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2021, 15 (04) : 1166 - 1182
  • [10] Christmann GB, 2009, RES METHODS SER, P157