The blind power: Power-led CEO overconfidence and M&A decision making

被引:26
作者
Hwang, Hyoseok [1 ]
Kim, Hyun-Dong [2 ]
Kim, Taeyeon [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Coll Business, Eau Claire, WI 54702 USA
[2] Sogang Univ, Grad Sch Int Studies, Seoul 04107, South Korea
[3] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Coll Business, Seoul 02455, South Korea
关键词
CEO overconfidence; CEO power; Mergers and acquisitions; Corporate governance; SELF-SERVING BIASES; CORPORATE DIVERSIFICATION; AGENCY COSTS; FIRM; COMPENSATION; ACQUISITIONS; ATTRIBUTION; GOVERNANCE; PERFORMANCE; CONTRACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.najef.2019.101141
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The behavioral finance literature attributes failed M&As to CEO overconfidence. We investigate the source of CEO overconfidence that leads to failed M&As. Among various determinants of CEO overconfidence, we propose that power-led CEO overconfidence delivers undesirable consequences in corporate investments. Using CEO-level data, we find that CEO power increases the probability of a CEO being overconfident. We also show that power-led overconfident CEOs tend to complete more deals regardless of economic circumstances, do stock acquisitions, and make diversifying acquisitions, relative to non-overconfident CEOs. The results suggest that the findings of previous studies on M&As by overconfident CEOs could be driven by power-led overconfident CEOs.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 76 条
[61]   Firm size and the gains from acquisitions [J].
Moeller, SB ;
Schlingemann, FP ;
Stulz, RM .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 73 (02) :201-228
[62]   The trouble with overconfidence [J].
Moore, Don A. ;
Healy, Paul J. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2008, 115 (02) :502-517
[63]   DO MANAGERIAL OBJECTIVES DRIVE BAD ACQUISITIONS [J].
MORCK, R ;
SHLEIFER, A ;
VISHNY, RW .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1990, 45 (01) :31-48
[64]   Are Incentive Contracts Rigged by Powerful CEOs? [J].
Morse, Adair ;
Nanda, Vikram ;
Seru, Amit .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2011, 66 (05) :1779-1821
[65]   CORPORATE FINANCING AND INVESTMENT DECISIONS WHEN FIRMS HAVE INFORMATION THAT INVESTORS DO NOT HAVE [J].
MYERS, SC ;
MAJLUF, NS .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1984, 13 (02) :187-221
[66]   THE HUBRIS HYPOTHESIS OF CORPORATE TAKEOVERS [J].
ROLL, R .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 1986, 59 (02) :197-216
[67]   Who is in whose pocket? Director compensation, board independence, and barriers to effective monitoring [J].
Ryan, HE ;
Wiggins, RA .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 73 (03) :497-524
[68]   Effects of corporate diversification on productivity [J].
Schoar, A .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2002, 57 (06) :2379-2403
[69]   The detrimental effects of power on confidence, advice taking, and accuracy [J].
See, Kelly E. ;
Morrison, Elizabeth W. ;
Rothman, Naomi B. ;
Soll, Jack B. .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2011, 116 (02) :272-285
[70]   The value of diversification during the conglomerate merger wave [J].
Servaes, H .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1996, 51 (04) :1201-1225