Inaccuracy of Venous Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

被引:29
|
作者
Pereira, Adriano Jose [1 ,2 ]
Correa, Thiago Domingos [1 ]
de Almeida, Francisca Pereira [1 ]
Deliberato, Rodrigo Octavio [1 ]
Lobato, Michelle dos Santos [1 ]
Akamine, Nelson [1 ]
Silva, Eliezer [1 ]
Cavalcanti, Alexandre Biasi [3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Israelita Albert Einstein, Intens Care Unit, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Lavras UFLA, Sch Med, Lavras, MG, Brazil
[3] Hosp Coracao, Res Inst HCor, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 06期
关键词
BLOOD-GLUCOSE; BEDSIDE GLUCOMETRY; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; ACCURACY; METERS; CAPILLARY; ARTERIAL; RECOMMENDATIONS; HEMATOCRIT; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0129568
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction Current guidelines and consensus recommend arterial and venous samples as equally acceptable for blood glucose assessment in point-of-care devices, but there is limited evidence to support this recommendation. We evaluated the accuracy of two devices for bedside point-of-care blood glucose measurements using arterial, fingerstick and catheter venous blood samples in ICU patients, and assessed which factors could impair their accuracy. Methods 145 patients from a 41-bed adult mixed-ICU, in a tertiary care hospital were prospectively enrolled. Fingerstick, central venous (catheter) and arterial blood (indwelling catheter) samples were simultaneously collected, once per patient. Arterial measurements obtained with Precision PCx, and arterial, fingerstick and venous measurements obtained with Accu-chek Advantage II were compared to arterial central lab measurements. Agreement between point-of-care and laboratory measurements were evaluated with Bland-Altman, and multiple linear regression models were used to investigate interference of associated factors. Results Mean difference between Accu-chek arterial samples versus central lab was 10.7 mg/dL (95% LA -21.3 to 42.7 mg/dL), and between Precision PCx versus central lab was 18.6 mg/dL (95% LA -12.6 to 49.5 mg/dL). Accu-chek fingerstick versus central lab arterial samples presented a similar bias (10.0 mg/dL) but a wider 95% LA (-31.8 to 51.8 mg/dL). Agreement between venous samples with arterial central lab was the poorest (mean bias 15.1 mg/dL; 95% LA -51.7 to 81.9). Hyperglycemia, low hematocrit, and acidosis were associated with larger differences between arterial and venous blood measurements with the two glucometers and central lab. Vasopressor administration was associated with increased error for fingerstick measurements. Conclusions Sampling from central venous catheters should not be used for glycemic control in ICU patients. In addition, reliability of the two evaluated glucometers was insufficient. Error with Accu-chek Advantage II increases mostly with central venous samples. Hyperglycemia, lower hematocrit, acidosis, and vasopressor administration increase measurement error.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF GLUCOSE POINT-OF-CARE VALUES WITH LABORATORY VALUES IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    Shearer, Anna
    Boehmer, Marilyn
    Closs, Melanie
    Dela Rosa, Rosalina
    Hamilton, Jean
    Horton, Karen
    McGrath, Rose
    Schulman, Christine
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 18 (03) : 224 - 230
  • [2] Comparison of point-of-care and laboratory glucose analysis in critically ill patients
    Lacara, Teresita
    Domagtoy, Caroline
    Lickliter, Donna
    Quattrocchi, Kathy
    Snipes, Lydia
    Kuszaj, Joanne
    Prasnikar, MaryClare
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2007, 16 (04) : 336 - 346
  • [3] The effects of precision, haematocrit, pH and oxygen tension on point-of-care glucose measurement in critically ill patients: a prospective study
    Watkinson, Peter James
    Barber, Vicki Suzanne
    Amira, Esther
    James, Timothy
    Taylor, Richard
    Young, John Duncan
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2012, 49 : 144 - 151
  • [4] Reliability and accuracy of bedside capillary blood glucose measurement by glucometers compared to venous blood glucose in critically ill patients: A facility based cross-sectional study
    Prabhakar, Manish Chandra
    Halder, Pritam
    CLINICAL NUTRITION ESPEN, 2024, 60 : 24 - 30
  • [5] DIFFERENCES IN GLUCOSE VALUES OBTAINED FROM POINT-OF-CARE GLUCOSE METERS AND LABORATORY ANALYSIS IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    Cook, Anjannette
    Laughlin, Delyla
    Moore, Margery
    North, Doreen
    Wilkins, Kathleen
    Wong, Gay
    Wallace-Scroggs, Allyson
    Halvorsen, Lisa
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 18 (01) : 65 - 71
  • [6] Clinical Reliability of Point-of-Care Glucose Testing in Critically Ill Patients
    Pilackas, Kylie
    El-Oshar, Seraj
    Carter, Chris
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 14 (01): : 65 - 69
  • [7] Comparing the accuracy of point-of-care with laboratory (capillary, venous, and arterial) blood glucose levels in critically ill patients with and without shock
    Alshaer, Abdulaziz
    Badgheish, Basma A.
    Alsadah, Zahra Hashim
    Sewify, Khalid
    Alghazal, Sarah
    Alzahrani, Sarah
    Qadi, Abeer
    Alqahtani, Reham
    Farsani, Ghadeer Abdullah
    Shilash, Amal
    BMC RESEARCH NOTES, 2022, 15 (01)
  • [8] Point-of-care blood glucose measurement errors overestimate hypoglycaemia rates in critically ill patients
    Nya-Ngatchou, Jean-Jacques
    Corl, Dawn
    Onstad, Susan
    Yin, Tom
    Tylee, Tracy
    Suhr, Louise
    Thompson, Rachel E.
    Wisse, Brent E.
    DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2015, 31 (02) : 147 - 154
  • [9] Are point-of-care measurements of glycated haemoglobin accurate in the critically ill?
    Weinel, Luke M.
    Summers, Matthew J.
    Finnis, Mark E.
    Poole, Alexis
    Kar, Palash
    Chapman, Marianne J.
    Deane, Adam M.
    Abdelhamid, Yasmine Ali
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 32 (06) : 465 - 470
  • [10] Point-of-Care Versus Central Laboratory Measurements of Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Glucose, Bicarbonate and Electrolytes: A Prospective Observational Study in Critically Ill Patients
    Allardet-Servent, Jerome
    Lebsir, Melissa
    Dubroca, Christian
    Fabrigoule, Martine
    Jordana, Sylvie
    Signouret, Thomas
    Castanier, Matthias
    Thomas, Guillemette
    Soundaravelou, Rettinavelou
    Lepidi, Anne
    Delapierre, Laurence
    Penaranda, Guillaume
    Halfon, Philippe
    Seghboyan, Jean-Marie
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (01):